Contemplation, one line a day.Towards a more humane society, an empathic society.
Spoon Theory and Autism
Plain Language Version
What is Spoon Theory?
Spoon theory helps explain how people with disabilities or chronic illnesses have limited energy each day. It was created by Christine Miserandino, who has lupus, to show what it's like to live with low energy.
How It Works
- Spoons = Energy: Imagine you have a certain number of spoons each day. Each spoon represents a bit of your energy.
- Using Spoons: Every activity, like getting out of bed, taking a shower, or going to work, uses up some of your spoons.
- Limited Spoons: People with disabilities have fewer spoons, so they need to be careful with how they use them to avoid running out of energy.
Spoon Theory and Autism
For autistic people, spoon theory can help explain why everyday things can be so tiring:
- Sensory Overload: Loud noises, bright lights, or crowded places can quickly use up spoons because they need a lot of energy to deal with.
- Social Interaction: Talking to people and being in social situations can be very tiring and use a lot of spoons too.
Understanding spoon theory can help people see why autistic individuals might get tired easily and need more rest. It encourages empathy and support, helping create a kinder and more inclusive world
----
Blindsight - Rethinking Human Consciousness and Perception
Blindsight is a neurological phenomenon that challenges our understanding of human consciousness and perception. It occurs in individuals with damage to the primary visual cortex, the brain area responsible for conscious visual awareness. Remarkably, these individuals can still respond to visual stimuli despite claiming to be blind. This phenomenon reveals that sensory modalities are not solely tied to the subjective experience of seeing; rather, they encompass the brain's capacity to process visual information and use it to guide behavior, even without conscious awareness.
In blindsight, the brain can still receive and process visual signals, enabling individuals to navigate their environment, detect objects, and respond to visual cues without the conscious experience of seeing. This challenges the traditional notion that vision is solely defined by conscious visual experiences.
The dichotomy between subjective experience and functional ability in blindsight is striking. Despite individuals' assertions of blindness, their brains can process visual information, allowing for subconscious recognition and response to visual stimuli. Studies have demonstrated that patients with blindsight can accurately guess the location, movement, and even emotional expression of objects and faces they claim not to see consciously.
Blindsight underscores the complexity of sensory processing, suggesting that perception involves multiple layers of neural processing beyond mere awareness. The brain, in cases of blindsight, can extract valuable information from visual input and integrate it into motor responses and decision-making processes. This demonstrates that vision transcends the confines of conscious experience. Blindsight challenges our conventional understanding of vision by emphasizing the brain's role in interpreting sensory input and using it to shape behavior, highlighting the intricate interplay between sensory modalities and cognitive processes in the human brain.
Blindsight and Autism: Potential Links and Considerations
While blindsight and autism are distinct conditions with different underlying mechanisms, exploring potential connections can offer valuable insights into sensory processing and perception in both. Here are some key points to consider.
Subconscious Processing in Blindsight and Autism: Blindsight highlights the brain's ability to process sensory information outside of conscious awareness. Similarly, some theories suggest that autistics might process sensory information differently, potentially involving atypical subconscious processing. For instance, people with autism may exhibit heightened sensitivity or insensitivity to certain stimuli, which could be related to differences in how sensory information is integrated and perceived.
Research on Visual Processing in Autism: Studies on visual processing in autism have shown that autistics might have atypical responses to visual stimuli, including differences in eye movement patterns, gaze behavior, and the perception of social cues. While these differences do not equate to blindsight, they suggest variations in the way visual information is processed and used in guiding behavior, which could share some conceptual similarities with the functional dissociation seen in blindsight.
Conscious vs. Unconscious Perception: Blindsight involves a dissociation between conscious perception and the ability to respond to visual stimuli. In autism, there may also be instances where individuals are aware of sensory input but may not consciously interpret or respond to it in expected ways. This could be due to differences in attention, sensory integration, or other cognitive processes.
Neural Mechanisms and Pathways: Both conditions underscore the complexity of the neural pathways involved in sensory processing. In blindsight, alternative neural pathways (such as those involving the superior colliculus and extrastriate cortex) compensate for the loss of V1 function. In autism, differences in neural connectivity and brain function have been noted, which might influence how sensory information is processed and perceived.
Versions of this post
Stims and Multisensory Integration
In the context of multisensory integration, autism stims or self-stimulatory can be understood as a way to manage and regulate sensory input from their environment. Multisensory integration refers to the neurological process where the brain combines information from different sensory systems to form a comprehensive understanding of one's surroundings. For autistics, this integration process can be atypical, leading to unique sensory experiences and responses.
Understanding Stims in Relation to Multisensory Integration:
Implications for Support and Intervention:
Understanding Stims in Relation to Multisensory Integration:
- Compensating for Sensory Processing Differences: Autistics may experience hypersensitivity or hyposensitivity to sensory stimuli. Stims can be a method to either dampen overwhelming sensory input or to seek additional stimulation to compensate for under-responsiveness.
- Creating Predictable Sensory Experiences: Repetitive behaviors, such as rocking or hand-flapping, provide a predictable and controllable sensory experience in a world that can often feel unpredictable and overwhelming. This predictability aids in multisensory integration by providing a constant sensory feedback loop.
- Facilitating Focus and Concentration: For some, engaging in stimming behaviors can enhance focus and help filter out extraneous sensory information. This self-regulation can aid in better integrating relevant sensory inputs.
- Self-Soothing and Emotional Regulation: Stimming can be a way to calm oneself in response to sensory overload. It serves as a mechanism to regulate emotional responses that arise from difficulties in processing multisensory information.
- Enhancing Sensory Discrimination: Certain stims may help autistics to differentiate between different sensory inputs. For example, tactile stims like rubbing textures might help in focusing on specific tactile sensations amidst a confusing array of sensory data.
- Aiding in Social and Communicative Functions: In a social context, stimming might assist autistics in managing the multisensory complexity of social interactions, such as processing visual, auditory, and spatial information simultaneously.
Implications for Support and Intervention:
(THIS AREA IS STILL NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD & VERY MUCH A WORK IN PROGRESS)
- Personalized Sensory Environments: Creating environments that take into account an individual's specific sensory processing needs can reduce the necessity for stimming as a compensatory mechanism.
- Sensory Integration Therapy: In theory this therapy is supposed to help autistics develop better skills to integrate and process multisensory information, potentially reducing the reliance on stimming behaviors for sensory regulation. But there is a lot of confusing and conflicting information about what exactly constitutes SIT.
- Educational and Behavioral Strategies: Incorporating multisensory learning and behavioral strategies that align with an individual's sensory preferences can enhance their ability to process information from multiple senses simultaneously.
Related Posts
Philosophy v Psychology
Philosophy and psychology share intertwined histories yet represent distinct approaches to understanding the human experience. Philosophy, the ancient and foundational discipline, explores profound questions about existence, reality, knowledge, and ethics. Philosophers engage in abstract reasoning and critical thinking to analyze concepts, often delving into debates about consciousness, morality, and the nature of reality. Philosophy operates on a theoretical level, focusing on conceptual exploration and reasoning. Throughout history, philosophical inquiries laid the groundwork for the study of the mind and behavior, providing the philosophical underpinnings upon which psychology would emerge.
In contrast, psychology emerged as a separate scientific discipline in the late 19th century, building upon the philosophical inquiries of earlier scholars. In the 19th century, figures like Wilhelm Wundt and William James are often credited with establishing psychology as a separate discipline. Wundt, for instance, founded the first psychological laboratory in 1879 in Leipzig, Germany, where he conducted experiments to study the elements of human consciousness. James, in the United States, wrote the influential book "The Principles of Psychology" in 1890, which helped establish psychology as a formal academic discipline.
In contrast, psychology emerged as a separate scientific discipline in the late 19th century, building upon the philosophical inquiries of earlier scholars. In the 19th century, figures like Wilhelm Wundt and William James are often credited with establishing psychology as a separate discipline. Wundt, for instance, founded the first psychological laboratory in 1879 in Leipzig, Germany, where he conducted experiments to study the elements of human consciousness. James, in the United States, wrote the influential book "The Principles of Psychology" in 1890, which helped establish psychology as a formal academic discipline.
Rooted in empirical observation and experimentation, psychology employs rigorous scientific methods to study human thought, emotion, and behavior. Psychologists use experiments, surveys, and observations to gather data, aiming to understand the underlying mechanisms that govern human actions. While philosophy contemplates abstract questions, psychology employs empirical evidence and data-driven approaches to explore topics such as perception, memory, and social behavior. Despite their shared historical roots, philosophy and psychology represent distinct methodologies—one characterized by theoretical inquiry and abstract reasoning, the other by empirical investigation and scientific observation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)