Showing posts with label HighSchool. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HighSchool. Show all posts

The Making of a Research Paper - Dopamine

Your teacher springs a research paper on you. What do you do? This is the Language course but the research topic was to be science-related. I could hear the virtual sighs of my classmates. Not everyone is a fan of science!!!


Choosing a research topic is probably the hardest thing in starting a research paper. There are just so many topics - the environment, the medical sciences, space.... Where do you start and where do you end? Your paper demands a tight thesis statement, especially if it is limited to 2400 words.


The process was interesting though. Lessons on plagiarism, and correct formatting of cited works. Putting citations in the correct MLA format just got a lot easier with sites like easybib.com. Put in all the information about your source and voila, out comes the nicely formatted output with all the italics and commas in place. It is not just a case of citing sources at the end but correcting referencing them during the course of your paper.


There were lessons on our interests and motivations, writing the thesis statement and outline. Our initial draft had to be turned into turnitin.com (checks for plagiarism) before it was submitted to the teacher for grading. And the best part was that if you got above 90 % in the first draft, you did not have to do a final draft and got full credit. 


So here's my research paper on the neurotransmitter Dopamine

Link to Paper


- Hari Srinivasan


Anonymous said...

Great Research!

Anonymous said...

Great post. I was checking continuously this blog and I'm impressed!
Extremely useful info specifically the last part :
) I care for such info a lot. I was seeking 
this certain info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

Anonymous said...

Hi there, the whole thing is going nicely 
here and ofcourse every one is sharing data, that's truly excellent, keep up writing.


Recovered Memory - True or False?

We got to study Memory this time in our High School Psychology Elective


How do we remember?  

Is everything we remember really true?  

Are our memories subject to modification due to external sources?  


It was an interesting topic. For a long time the Freudian lead School of Psychoanalysis held sway. But of late, there has been a paradigm shift that raises some serious questions.

Recovered Memory - True or False?

Becoming Addicted to Behaviors

 Becoming Addicted to Behaviors


There exists a great deal of comfort in the human mind when definitions are laid out within well-defined boundaries. The definition of "Addiction" illustrates this dilemma. Traditionally the term was used primarily in conjunction with ingested substance addiction. But what of behavioral addictions built up due to repetitive uses and habits. It is as devastating in terms of its psychological, biological and social effects. Limiting a definition is really blinding oneself to the existence of other problems in the same vein. (Having said that, too broad a definition, as is the case with autism; which has become a catch-all bucket; really dilutes the possibility of quickly attaining meaningful solutions). 


The challenge is that understanding behaviors continues to be an enigma for scientists and sociologists alike, as we have not still fully understand the workings of the human mind. It is rational and irrational all at the same time. The human consciousness is a very complex process. So the debate continues as to whether we can group pyschoactive physical addictions (eg: drugs) and say, the pathological need to gamble, which is a process or activity addiction. Nevertheless I believe that both substance abuse and behavioral addictions are “additions” – both lead to neuroadaptation. Only if both are recognized as such, will efforts be made to find solutions. 


Behaviors in our society have changed in its nature and scope over the last few decades. The internet for example was non-existent 2 decades ago, as was the concept of internet-addiction. Expectations have also changed - life has become confusing and complex. Behaviors that arise almost as coping mechanisms soon become obsessive compulsive addictions. Why are there so many obese people (due to eating disorders) in a society outwardly obsessed with the unrealistic model-thin beauty. Have our societal expectations changed so much that a percentage of the population can no longer keep up and resorts to "quick-fix" behaviors. 


These behavioral patterns are quick-fixes to begin with, but their effect is intense in the pleasure derived. It acts as a powerful emotional operand and appears an inviting outlet in which to lose oneself from all the stresses of societal reality. The step from craving to compulsion blurs. The internet for instance offers the chance of becoming another virtual persona. You can be everything you are not in real life. 


The consequences don't seem bad either. After all you are not abusing drugs or drinking and driving. Ergo, there can be no perceived risks! Activity additions are not even viewed as potential addictions by its victim (denial). But when the repeated activity has significantly changed behavioral patterns (quantitatively) such that it dominates to the detriment of other behaviors, it has truly become an addiction. The strength of the addition and the subjective change in experience it brings can cause significant shifts in neurochemistry, just like in substance addiction. Ironically, substance addiction is easier to identify and therefore, easier to treat as there is a tangible object of addiction.       


Even from a purely behavioral viewpoint (BF Skinner), a person will engage in more of the behavior that is positively reinforced. A feel-good behavior is therefore likely to be repeated. If this cause –effect relationship resulting in a repeated behavior crosses a threshold where it becomes detrimental, it has then become an addiction. This can apply to all kinds of things – be it gambling, internet use, or over-eating. Indeed, people can become addicted to behaviors.

Accidental Misfit

Frankenstein by Mary Shelly 


My image of the creature in Frankenstein, prior to reading, had been far from positive. In fact I thought the creature’s name was Frankenstein, given the title of the book. I did not realize that his creator was Victor Frankenstein and that the creature himself is unnamed in the story.  I imagined a huge, grotesque, green, human-like figure that went around murdering innocents, for no rhyme or reason. Why green? – I don’t know, maybe I was confusing him with the Incredible Hulk who is a perpetual state of rage. Or perhaps since he was made of dead body parts, the green color represented the decayed body. The creature was in my mind just pure evil, a one-man slaughterhouse for any human that crossed his path. Perhaps he even tortured his victims before killing them. Maybe he even ate them. 

I felt that the creation itself was possibly an act of accident on the part of a wayward scientist -  Victor Frankenstein, which resulted in this intensely furious monster, bent on destruction, much like that depicted in many monster movies. Such a monster would logically chase and try to wipe out his creator and kin. For me, the two figures were on either side of black and white. The creator was the innocent victim; the creature was this evil black-hearted aggressor to be destroyed. A number of humans were bound to be killed over the course of the story to justify this. The happy ending would have been the creator destroying this evil creature and saving the girl.   

Reading the story put a different perspective on the characters of both Victor Frankenstein and the creature. It brought out the humanness of the creature and contrasted it with the duplicity of Frankenstein. It told the story of an accidental grotesque misfit, who desperately sought societal approval and of a scientist who did not want to take responsibility for his actions.  



Rest of Commentary continued on my Academic Blog. 

http://hariatwork.blogspot.com/2011/03/frankenstein-by-mary-shelley.html

Volunteerism

Volunteerism


Why do people volunteer? Is it because it brings about a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction – that someone has benefited from their act of service?   It is because it has enriched their lives? For some, it is a way of life and for others it may bring some form of recognition and help in their career or life.  There are many intrinsic and extrinsic benefits to volunteering. Why then are more people not volunteering?


Many people may have the intrinsic desire to volunteer but don't quite know how to start or what to do. How does one go about this process? Do they have the time to do it? Is it a lot of work? Would they have to travel great distances?  Then there are factors such as whether it will be in line with their personal beliefs. There may even be skepticism on whether the needs of the target population (the recipients of the volunteerism) been identified properly. Volunteerism should also be done in a way, that the target population does not feel beholden or under some sort of obligation.


Therefore for volunteer participation to increase, there needs to be dissemination of information that answer some, if not all these questions. These questions need to be answered in layman's terms, so it is not just the “educated” who can understand it. In today's world, there are many ways to disseminate this information – through the media, social networking sites, the Internet etc. And there is actually a lot of information available on volunteer activities online that one can take part in. 


However the overriding factor that limits volunteering, is the lack of concrete examples to follow in one’s own local community. Volunteering is an abstract concept for many. One sees examples on TV of people in places like Africa handing out supplies. Such scenarios make volunteerism seem impossible for the common person. Many don't realize that volunteering can start in one’s own community.  All is takes is but one local example for others to follow. 


An example of a program that can greatly benefit by increased volunteer participation is the Special Olympics. Most associate it with the Para Olympics held every four years. It’s a very abstract event for most.  But Special Olympics in fact offers free sports training camps throughout the year in most areas, for all ages. Each training period, which runs for around 3 months, covers a specific sport. This way they can offer access to many different sports. Some of these are basketball, baseball, bowling, running, bocce etc. It also serves as a supportive environment and opportunities for the differently-abled to socialize and make friends. These camps are run in most part by volunteers. It stands to follow that the number of volunteers will determine the number and frequency of camps and the variety of sports that can be offered. 


This is actually a wonderful volunteer opportunity for high-schoolers and college goers, especially those who are sports inclined.  In essence, a program designed to encourage volunteer participation in this would involve for instance, presentations at local high schools. These would cover the issues discussed earlier.


  • Information about the hows, whats and whys of the program 
  • Tangible benefits (increased physical ability, access to sport programs) and intangible benefits (socialization, self-confidence) to the differently-abled.
  • The specific tasks involved during the course of volunteering, including training for the volunteers.  
  • Skills sets that high schoolers as volunteers, can bring to the program eg: fresh ideas, energy
  • Time commitment (once a week for 3-4 months of a year is a short enough time commitment for most students)
  • Distances involved for volunteers (usually within the same county or area)
  • Tangible benefits to volunteers (volunteer credit hours, looks good on college apps and on resumes) Intangible benefits to volunteers. Existing volunteers can talk about what they felt about doing this activity. If there are existing high school volunteers, they too can talk about their experiences; thus lead by example. 
  • The benefit for the school administrators is that such opportunities offer positive influences and experiences for their students.  


The youth of our country is primed to take part in volunteerism. Incentives such as volunteer credit hours in high school help instill such values in young adolescent minds. There is even presidential recognition for outstanding volunteerism by high school students. These impressions will carry over in their adult lives.  If one high-school student participates in a volunteer activity, and talks or texts about it to his friends, his friends will follow and then their friends etc. That is human mentality. 


Volunteering in effect is a win-win scenario for humans as a race. Its spread will greatly increase positive thinking and increase our level of consciousness, which in turn will reduce the negatives of human thought and behaviors such as crime and violence. 

What's Wrong with the News?

I had to write a persuasive essay for school, just before the winter break. Just got it back after it was graded by my teacher. Score 100/100 - cool! 


We first had to pick a topic, then write a plan then then write a draft. . The our teacher had us submit the essay to a site called turnitin.com which checks the essay for plagarism. Then we had to submit our essays to her


What’s Wrong with the News?
(Violence, a consequence of  TV News!)


We were in the airport departure lounge for a mere 40 minutes. The same news channel was on all of the half-dozen TV screens all around. Two rapes, a murder and a teacher's affair with a minor student! All in rapid succession -one after the other!  The graphic images of these violent acts carried on in the viewer's mind, long after the news program was done. I now get why my family does not watch much TV news anymore!


When did news morph from "information" to "all that's violent in the world"? Why not just call them crime reports or sensational reports.


One may well argue that "crimes" and other such "news", needs to be reported, just so that people are aware of the injustices of the world. That it is, in fact, a moral obligation. Indeed, many efforts to rectify problems arise from our awareness of their existence in the world. Would the rest of the world been aware of the Tiananmen Square massacre of student protestors (instances of human rights abuse), if they had not been seen it on the news? Freedom struggles throughout the world have benefited from the exposure of their issues on TV. In that sense, such exposure is noteworthy. 


However, since when did positives stop being newsworthy? Surely, the entire human population (or even a subset of your city) is not engaged in heinous acts 24x7. Does a "positive" have to cross the threshold of "sensational" to become newsworthy?  Man, a social animal, is constantly shaped and conditioned by what he sees, hears and is exposed to. Can this constant and focused bombardment of crime and negativity be   positive for the psyche of our society? Have we thought through its implications?  And we wonder why crime and violence is on the rise in our cities. According to the Senate Judiciary Committee Report, 1999, "Television alone is responsible for 10% of youth violence."


Truth be told, this constant diet of violent images is desensitizing our minds to the act of violence itself. As each mental threshold to violent images is crossed, the networks seek out and display, even greater violent images. Violence has acquired lighter shades of gray, where it's "acceptable" or even "ok".


There has been much talk of legislative regulation of media violence with regards to its effect on children. This has been the result of studies focused on children’s entertainment programs – movies, games, cartoons etc. Such initiatives are indeed commendable. Shockingly, such statistics and guidelines on TV violence do not include the “news." Parents are given guidelines (PG 13 etc) for “fictional” programming. However, the V-chip on newer TVs (which blocks transmission of violent programs into homes), does not take into consideration news and sports programs. Are we sending confusing signals, when it comes to the news programs? Is this violence "ok," because its “real-life,” compared to violence in other programming? 


Invariably, children do end up seeing a lot of violence via news programming. Even if it's limited at home, it's on the TV monitors at the gym (even places like the family friendly YMCA), at restaurants, and yes, even the airport. And one does come across the news inadvertently, when looking for other programs on TV. According to Dr Juliette H. Walma van der Molen(1)  , “children depend heavily on television news to stay informed.” 


Just this month, a fifteen year old held his classmates hostage, and finally killed himself. It was widely reported and analyzed on the news. Are you surprised? Such incidents no longer seem like random acts of violence. Indeed, it could well be that the continual influence of violent images psychologically leads to more mental disturbances and aggression. Studies have indeed confirmed these effects.  For instance, Huesmann LR, Moise-Titus J, Podolski CL and Eron LD(2)  observed “short-term aggressive behavior” (due to heightened arousal processes) and long-term learning of violent-scripts” (after repeated exposure to violence on the news)”. Since the “real-world” is presented as constantly violent on the news, children feel justified in being aggressive themselves, as a means of conflict-resolution.


What about it's effects on adults? The human life span extends a good 8-9 decades. A good portion of the human life is spent in adulthood. Can the human mind sustain such incessant bombardment? Just as we are told about the power of positive thinking, it is possible that the reverse (negative behaviors) may be the effect of negative thinking brought on by incessant negative images. A study done by Tamyra Pierce(3)  , showed that repeated use of words like, “shoot, kill, gun etc. by the media, triggered aggressive thoughts in insecure individuals.” 


Crime, violence and negativity make for a "Good News Day!" News programs seem to relish dissecting and analyzing every gory detail of each crime and spend an inordinate number of hours on doing so. Newscasters seem more to try to influence viewers by interjecting their views, or those of "agreeing" experts, than give facts, which is what "news" was supposed to be about.


Sadly, violence has now become an addiction of sorts for our society. We have lost empathy and have become insensitive to acts of violence. We crave to see more and hear more of it. Its influence pervades all aspects of our life. And as with all addicts, we are in a state of denial about our addiction.


In recent times, the only real positive news that took up significant news airtime was the Miners rescue in South America. It was indeed a fine example of the Humanity of Mankind at its best. As a society, we need to re-look and re-examine what “news” really means. If it is a show about trying to influence people’s views and filled with “expert” opinions, it should not be called “news” at all, and should be subject to the same regulations as any entertainment programming. 


Furthermore, news itself need not be negative-centric and need not be extreme. Above all, it should not be sensational-oriented.  Awareness of issues can be brought about without excessive rhetoric and excessive use graphic images, which have such severe negative psychological effects on society.  We also need a good dose of the “positives” to balance the psychological load.   If TV news were more representative of a fair balance, inclusive of the positives of society, and less sensational, would there not be less violence in our society?


How can we bring about this change? Simple action by individuals cumulates into compound results on society. There are the traditional forms such as letters to the editor and letters to your congressman. With the power of the today’s Internet, one can take a single opinion or issue out to millions and help bring about change fairly rapidly.  It takes but a single drop of snow to start an avalanche.


Man as a race, has overcome many an obstacle that has come in the way in the past. There have been periods in our civilization when we have wandered off the main path, but we have always found a way back and have managed to correct some of the wrongs. Man as a race, will continue to do so in the future. That is the power of the Homo-Sapien mind! We can find solutions if we put our mind to it.


- Hari Srinivasan 


Sources
1. Walma van der Molen PhD, Juliette H; “Violence and Suffering in Television News: Towards a Broader Conception of Harmful Television Content for Children” (Department of Communication, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/full/113/6/1771

2. Huesmann LR, Moise-Titus J, Podolski CL, Eron LD. Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977–1992. Dev Psychol.2003; 39 :201 –221

3. Violent News Coverage is Triggering Additional Violence
http://mentalhealth.about.com/library/sci/1102/blvoilence1102.htm

4. National Crime Prevention Council “ Violence in the News”
http://www.ncpc.org/topics/by-audience/parents/media-literacy/violence-in-the-news

5. KidsHealth.org, School Violence and the News
http://kidshealth.org/parent/positive/talk/school_violence.html

6. Violence of TV: The Desensitizing of America
http://www.ridgenet.org/szaflik/tvrating.htm

Pros and Cons of Optimism

For this unit in Literature, we had to pick between "Sense and Sensibility" (by Jane Austen) and Night (by Elie Wiesel.) Turns out most of the class picked Sense and Sensibility. Only three of us picked Night. I wonder why?? Isn't it always better to pick a true story over a fictional piece? Don't we learn real life lessons from the experiences of others?


Our class discussions run for a whole week and our responses are  "graded" too! And it was just three people this time. One of the other boys posted his responses first in German. Google Translator to the rescue. Then I pointed out that Elie Wiesel had first written his book in Yiddish. His posts changed to Hebrew after that.  Again Google Translator to the rescue. But really, it was fun in a way.


On some fronts, optimism is dangerous such as those experienced by the Jews living in Signet during World War II. Elie Wiesel (holocaust survivor) portrays the Jews of Sighet, somewhat like ostriches with their heads buried in the sand, who think they are somehow safe - all the way to Auschwitz. Yet, in a way, optimism is what kept Eliezer alive. The human will to survive ceases, if optimism dies. 


Optimism is all the more essential in today’s world. Look at the case of the Chilean Miners, who were trapped so long underground. Should they have given up all hopes of rescue? Should the rescuers have given up hopes of finding them alive either? The power of positive thinking often gives an impetus toward finding solutions. It also lends itself to other positive qualities like creativity, patience and forbearance in man. This allows him more mental clarity in which to carry out his tasks.   


This discussion of Optimism inspired a poem titled "Optimism Sans Realism" 

Inner Journeys - Balancing the Dreamer and Realist

Star Food is a short story by Ethan Caine. The protagonist Dade is torn between the differing expectations of his mother and father. As a result, Dade is often unsure how to act. What appealed to me about this story is that its a journey of discovery - as he struggles to balance the dreamer vs the realist. 


A Journey of Discovery


The entire story is one of “self-discovery.” Dade is at a stage in his life where he does not know where he is headed. His mother is an idealist, a dreamer  (illustrated by constant references to the Sky in the story). His father is more practical, hard-working and earth-bound.  (The story highlights this difference with "sky + dreamers = slums" while "hardwork + practical =good home"). Though Dade uses his mother’s ideals as a pretext to get out of work, he is still not sure where his place is in  scheme of life. 


The instances with the shoplifter, jolts this confusion and gives him some perspective into his journey. The way Dade handled her was necessary as part of his inner journey. In the first few instances he lets her go as he is more inclined to be the dreamer philosopher. As he becomes more earth-aware, he realizes she is no more than a common thief and catches her. But then he lets her go, after catching her, telling us that he is reaching a better balance in his mind in his journey of dreamer vs. realist. 


The instances with the shoplifter, jolts this confusion and gives him some perspective into his journey. His actions were necessary as part of his inner journey. In the first few instances he lets her go as he is more inclined to be the dreamer philosopher. As he becomes more earth-aware, he realizes she is no more than a common thief and catches her. But then he lets her go, after catching her, telling us that he is reaching a better balance in his mind in his journey of dreamer vs. realist.


Cyber Bullying

Cyber Bullying


Bullying has always reared its ugly head in our society through the ages. But people no longer have to be physically big or powerful, in order to bully and threaten others. They have a new powerful tool at their disposal -  Technology. With technology, bullies can often remain anonymous and that is very empowering for them. Any kind of harassment or bullying using electronic devices is generally referred to as Cyber bullying. 


Cyber Bullying and can in fact be even more damaging to the victim. The cyber bully’s reach is not confined to just the schoolyard anymore. Its reach, haunts them in all aspects of their life, invades their privacy, affects their reputation and may even cause financial losses. It can be as simple as hateful websites about a person, bombarding them with malicious emails or text messages or spamming others while pretending to be the victim. It could even be publicizing , personal information about the victim, which could in effect make them targets for offline bullying.      


I have thankfully never been the victim of cyber bullying.  However instances of cyberbullying abound all around.


Last month, a Rutgers Student University left a webcam on it his room, and livecast his roommate, Tyler Clementi, having sex with another man.  In addition to doing live streaming, his roommate also tweeted about this on Twitter. A devastated Tyler posted a goodbye message on Facebook, and committed suicide.  Maybe he did not want others to know he was gay. Whatever his reasons, they were still his own, and webcasting his personal life was inhumane. 


Amanda Marcuson, of Birmingham, Michigan had reported some other girls in her class for stealing. In response she was spammed with malicious text-messages – as many as 50 in just 2-3 hours. (Incidentally both examples were reported by the press so I have used their original names). 


Some instances of cyber bullying are extreme and can even led to a tragic death like the Rutgers Student. But even milder forms of cyber bullying can lead to lower self-esteem, a drop in grades, depression and being ostracized by peers. 


We always have to be careful when we are online. It is never a good idea to give out our personal information when online – our age, address or even school. We should also be careful about privacy settings on our web browsers and other sites we use. On public forums, it is important to remember that written word really can’t be taken back. We never know who is going to read it. You should always keep in mind that there are people who misrepresent themselves or have less than noble intentions. While teens may like privacy from parents, they are still a trusted source. Our privacy from strangers is even more important and parents need to be in the loop as much as possible.  


As great as Technology is, a small segment of the population always seems to finds ways to misuse it and use it for destructive purposes. We have to be on our guard for that.

Vocabulary or Literature or Composition?

This was a prompt for  my Literature class discussion.  


Prompt: Which is more important - Vocabulary, Literature or Composition?


Vocabulary is but a building block of language. But if you think of language as a means of communication amongst mankind, then the prosody of vocabulary merges seamlessly into the whole.  Vocabulary by itself,  is a mere component. 


Literature exposes us to works of the great writers –current and past. We learn their thoughts, their stories, and the strength of their imagination. Literature has greatly shaped our thinking process over the centuries. It is a reflection of culture, of society and delves into the possibilities.


Writers however, can start revolutions. Composition skills, allows us to be part of the force - one that can shape the world that is to come. We can influence, we can cajole, we can persuade, we can dissuade. In Literature we hear from others, but it is in composition, that others learn about you. Our unique experiences and thought processes can be brought out through composition.


We have truly to be vested in making our world a better place. Surely then, composition has to be the most important of the three.


Innocence Lost

A Essay on Child Labor.  My essay won a Merit Award from Scholastic California Writing Project.


Innocence Lost!


The 1910s was a glorious “Coming of Age” period for the United States. We were emerging as a bonafide industrial powerhouse and dazzled the world with our new machinery and inventions. Immigrants poured into the country in search of economic opportunities and the American Dream. In 1910, 40% of the population in New York was foreign born and 38% was first generation. Factories abounded and business owners knew naught but profits.


Many of new immigrants did not know English and even less of American Democracy. They eked out a living at these factories that dotted the cities. They worked long hours and endured miserable working conditions. Early capitalism precluded notions of social responsibility by corporations. There was no concept of worker safety – that would cut into bottom lines. Few of the workers could afford childcare, so the younger ones often wandered the streets. When the wages are below-subsistence and there are many mouths to feed, everyone is forced to work – even the children. And what better way to cut costs for the factory owners than to employ child labor.


Innocence Lost!


In  1910, only 48% of kids in Rhode Island attended school.  Education, leisure and play were the privilege of the wealthy minority. And only these children had the opportunity to really enjoy their childhood.


Life for many of the “other” kids was confined to the walls of manufacturing factories all across the cities of America. They worked in cigar factories, textile mills and packing factories. Technology had made the machinery easy to operate especially in the textile industry e.g.: the Arkwright Machines. One adult supervising a number of children meant larger profits. They were even small enough to crawl under textile machinery to oil it. They were locked in for long hours and beaten if they fell asleep. Crowded and unhygienic conditions often resulted in respiratory and other ailments.  The glorious Industrial Revolution was in full force in the United States!


Social Reformers like Jane Addams recognized the issues that plagued the polyglot society of the 1910s. Though she was from a wealthy background, she chose to do something about it. The establishment of Hull House in Chicago provided an oasis for the immigrant population. For the children, this meant day care, chance at an education and the childhood pursuit of play. Her efforts resulted in Chicago’s first public playground and the building of more schools. And she worked toward passing laws that made child labor illegal and the establishment of juvenile courts.


A hundred years later; we have come a long way. The United States has passed and implemented child labor laws.  The Fair Labor Standards Act restricts employment and abuse of children in the US. It also does much to protect their educational opportunities and restricts their employment in hazardous jobs. It restricts the number of hours children under 16 can work. There is even a separate enforcement division called Wage and Hour Division.


We have cleaner and safer working conditions now. Our society and economy went from strength to strength and we became a global superpower.  We lead the world in the search and discovery of new technology. As we moved to fresher pastures, much of the work we used to do, has moved to other countries. For example, most of the manufacturing has moved out of the United States to emerging economies like China.


The US continues to be the world’s largest consumer with its enormous purchasing power. The illusion of a vast virtual income is further driven by the existence of endless credit. Capitalism is based on supply and demand. There are many countries willing to produce and sell goods that satisfy the insatiable appetite of America. And we also insist on getting them cheaper and cheaper too.


The image of those ragged American children working in textile mills have become mere photos in our history textbooks. But we have just replaced them with the unseen images of millions of non-American children in other countries. Have we just transferred the social injustices of our past onto other countries?


Have we as a society, really considered the consequences of our incessant consumerism. Did we ever stop to consider, for example, that the expensive diamonds – “the gift of love” - that we wear, could be the toil of child labor in the diamond mines of Africa?


We cannot put on blinders and pretend that our history or our future is not closely interlinked with that of the rest of the world. After all, immigrants from all over the world make up this country.


For corporations in a capitalistic society, the bottom line is still a determining factor. As environment, labor and safety laws became more stringent in the United States; the multi-national corporations simply moved the jobs overseas to countries where the laws were less rigid or not enforced as well. Child labor is considered illegal in many countries today, thanks to efforts of organizations such as the International Labor Organization and UNICEF, but is poorly enforced in most.


In 2008, as many as 1000 school age children were found working in the manufacturing zones in the Guangdong Province of China (near Hong Kong). Labor recruiters are believed to have lured thousands of children away from the poverty stricken Liangshan region of China. Ironically stricter enforcement of adult labor laws and inflation had made these manufacturing sectors turn to illegal child labor to stay competitive. They produce much of the cheap toys and electronics that kids in the US enjoy.


In 2004, some 480 children, some as young as 5-6 yrs old, were rescued from embroidery factories in New Delhi, India. These sweatshops produced clothing for GAP Kids in the US. Surely this is not what we had in mind when we started to outsource. Similar scenarios of child labor have arisen with Firestone Inc at their metal plantation in Liberia. H&M, a worldwide fashion retail chain has been accused of using cotton from Siberia, where children under 10 often work the fields.


The sad truth is that child labor is common in many parts of the world – in agriculture, mining, domestic work, industry and informal sectors. They often endure cruel and harsh conditions. While, we in the United States have fought against it, ironically we may in part be encouraging it in other parts of the world.


The US has put in much effort, by passing laws such as the Child Labor Deterrence Act in 1993 (Harkin's Bill). This curbs the import of goods that uses child labor in any stage of its production. But is boycotting such goods, really the best solution? UNICEF found that thousands of child laborers lost their jobs in the garment industries of Bangladesh as a result of this Act.  Driven by poverty, they simply moved to more hazardous jobs like stone-crushing. The UNICEF, IPEC (International Program for Elimination of Child Labor – A division of ILO) and other non-profits are now trying to rehabilitate these kids by slowly phasing them into schools.


Sometimes it happens right under the nose of our democracy. In 2008, Agriprocessors, a meat packaging company in Kentsville, Iowa, was charged with over 9000 child labor law violations, involving 32 minors. Of these 7 were under the age of 16. One always hears stories of sweatshops right in the US where immigrants work long and grueling hours for little pay. Who is to say that minors are not in that group that works in those very sweatshops?


The reasons for child labor remain the same whether it is 1910 or 2010. Abject poverty drives entire family to work. There isn’t a parent in the world that does not want their child to have an education or enjoy the pursuits of childhood. And it is economic conditions that make parents willingly or unwillingly send their kids off to work as they depend on the additional income. Perhaps there are no educational opportunities available to that child in that region and the alternative is working.


Discovery and rehabilitation of child workers is a good short term solution. So is raising public awareness and corporate responsibility by passing and implementing laws. But the real long term solution to worldwide child labor is really to increase the standard of living in all countries and across all strata of society. Only then can child labor truly become mere images in history books across the world. 



Sources:


"Government and Immigration." 1910's Government and Politics. Gale Cengage, 1996. eNotes.com. 2006. 15 Jan, 2010 http://www.enotes.com/1910-government-politics-american-decades/government-immigration

Whaples, Robert. "Child Labor in the United States". EH.Net Encyclopedia, edited by Robert Whaples. October 7, 2005. URL http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/whaples.childlabor

Slater, Samuel. “Father or the American Industrial Revolution”. Jan 15, 2010 http://www.woonsocket.org/slaterchildlabor.html

United States Department of Labor – Youth and Labor  Jan 2010 http://www.dol.gov/dol/topic/youthlabor/index.htm

The History Place: Child Labor in America 1908-1912 http://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/childlabor/

Hakim, Joy.  “A History of US – Book 7, An Age of Extremes.”

The New York Times. 5/10/2008. Child Labor Rings Reach China’s Distant Villages http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/10/world/asia/10CHINA.html

The New York Times. 11/15/2007. GAP Moves to recover from Child Labor Scandal http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/15/business/worldbusiness/15iht-gap.1.8349422.html

The Iowa Independent. 9/9/2008 Agriprocessors charged with over 9000 child labor law violations http://iowaindependent.com/5235/agriprocessors-charged-with-9000-child-labor-law-violations

United States Dept of Labor – Bangladesh Jan 2010 http://www.dol.gov/ilab/media/reports/iclp/sweat/bangladesh.htm

Rahman, Mufizur et al. Child Labor in Bangladesh: A Critical Appraisal of Harkin's Bill and the MOU-Type Schooling Program. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 33, 1999 http://www.questia.com/googleScholar.qst;jsessionid=LSQGQQHSJWZdNKHLwp0J6G0yHyCrmYLv5dpmvYMZRLjhP2fBvhvf!-852814118!1201110973?docId=5001865348

ILO, Investing in every child: An economic study of the Costs and Benefits of Eliminating Child Labor. Dec 2003 http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---webdev/documents/publication/wcms_071311.pdf

ILO, Diamonds are Forever, But Not the Lives of Child Workers. Nov 2006. http://ihscslnews.org/view_article.php?id=162


A Definitely Possibility

A Definite Possibility!                      

“Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech.”


And thus the vision of the founding fathers was sealed. They were from diverse backgrounds. Some were Deists who did not recognize religion as such but believed in the notion of a creator, and that reason was the basis of all knowledge. Others were Christians and there was even an Atheist in the mix.  They envisaged a republic that was free from oppression of any kind  - not just from rulers, but also between different groups of its citizens. 

"It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers, but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part.  Different interests necessarily exist in different classes of citizens.  If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure." (No. 51)

A fundamental aspect was, of course, to protect the right of religious expression – to practice one’s set of beliefs, even if it was in variance with other groups.

However, over the decades, parts of the US has tilted to being more Judeo-Christian centric, with lower tolerances for other religions. While the Ten Commandants are absolutely unique and in a way a very profound set of maxims, it is hardly reasonable to have them placed at some of our courthouses – especially when one of the commandments states, “Thou shalt not follow any God but me”. A republic can be, “for the people and by the people,” only if every citizen has equal access to this right. Associating the offices that uphold the judicial wing of our secular government with such a statement for example, does not give the impression of fair justice for all.

All religions have to be respected, for their basic value systems are essentially the same. There are the notions of morals, fairness, love, charity and being a productive member of society, no matter what one’s economic or social status is. These are basic human principles necessary for man to survive in a society. Even non-believers of religions follow such fundamental human principles.

But this also imparts a responsibility on the shoulders of its citizens – how far does one take the conviction of freedom of religious expression?  It can be argued as to who defines these limits. It has to be limits that define functioning of just human societies. The spirit of this principle is indeed negated when other religions are vilified or ridiculed.

The US has moved past its colonial roots, where religions of the conquered, be they monotheist or polytheist, were regarded as inferior. We may or may not agree with specifics of other religions and some practices may seem strange or unusual to us, but what is wrong in toleration unless they violate a fundamental human right.

Despite the seeming shortcomings, the US is actually one of the most tolerant societies in the world toward religion and religious expression.  But to move ahead as a society we have to make it more so.

This boils down to education and awareness of other religions. As you learn about other religions, old prejudices are stripped away in terms of what their core values represent. Criminals abound in all societies and religions. A criminal will commit crimes, irrespective of the religion he was born into (or converted to). And there are always going to be people who will commit heinous acts in the name of religion. They may even whip others into a state of frenzy citing religion as a reason. But this is a result of their own flawed interpretation of what their sacred texts state. No religion on earth condones hate crimes, genocide, exploitation or even simple theft.

Religious differences seem to be an underlying factor in conflicts worldwide today. As a society, we have to move towards unity and harmony.  The US, given its giant status, can do much to dissipate tensions. But the foundation has to be laid in its own citizens.

The US has over the last few centuries, been a melting pot for people from all walks of the world.  People have flocked here for many reasons - both economic and social. They have even fled here to escape political persecution – from the Jews during Hitler’s rule to recent immigrants escaping tyrannical regimes.

When there is freedom of expression, people can express their grievances against a political system or government. It gives you the right to protest in Washington DC or elsewhere in the country, without fear of arrest and harassment. This is in sharp contrast to say, the treatment meted out to the protesters demonstrating against Tibetan Occupation at the Beijing Olympics.

This really is the underlying factor in our founding father’s vision of “freedom of expression” – that of political expression. They themselves were trying to shake off the shackles of British Colonialism. Our modern US democracy has sometimes strayed from this path e.g.: the McCarthy Era. And we may not always agree with the direction that some administration may be taking us. There are always short-term glitches and mistakes we make along the way. We are involved in another endless Vietnam style war in Afghanistan. We have just replaced rainforests and swamps for scorching deserts and caves. Then we got distracted by starting another war in Iraq and got sidetracked from our initial goal of capturing Osama Bin Laden who is still at large. But it is debate and discussion that highlights these issues. And it is this very freedom of expression, which will eventually help us get back on track.

In the end, democracy evolves and becomes all the more vibrant, as discussion expands. And healthy debate can happen only when freedom of expression is upheld. The founding fathers gave us a great framework to work with. We now have to help define it.

Freedom of Expression has played a great role in shaping racial tolerance in our country. Where would we be without the mountain-moving words of figures like Rev Martin Luthur King Jr., during the Civil Rights Movement? Only when the voices of all are heard, even those of minorities, can we progress as a society. And there are many such minority residents whose voices need to be heard in our country. They have to be given the courage to express their views. Many new immigrants are not even aware they have this right. In large part, they come to this country so that they too can become productive members of society. In many ways they are willing to work harder in order to succeed. Freedom of expression is such a profound concept, that its influence and reach can be difficult to grasp at first. Newer immigrants need to be educated so that they too have access to this right. The responsibility lies with us to not misuse it as a propaganda tool either.

The US is like a giant soup bowl – a mix of populations, both diverse and interesting. Immigration has defined this country. We have been an Immigration-Mecca, beckoned anon by Lady Liberty and her flaming torch. Our vision on immigration in the future will continue to define the face of this country.

The constant immigration is what enables the US to keep its edge in the global marketplace. Immigration brings with it fresh ideas, fresh minds and new outlooks. We flourish as an economy because of it.

Then there are others, who may argue for restricting immigration, citing other reasons, and push for protectionist policies. But if you look at it, the real original natives are the American Indians. The original colonists were themselves, immigrants. Even the founding fathers were immigrants or descended from immigrants. Are we confusing restricting immigration to racial intolerance where some immigrants are more equal than others, depending on their country of origin?

Then there is the conundrum of illegal immigration. Why are there so many illegal immigrants in our country? A number of them seem to be working and thereby contributing to society. By far, the jobs done by them may be menial, “underground” and unwanted by others. But these jobs too, have to be done. Can a way not be found to bring them under the folds of the legal umbrella, especially if they are contributing members, or give them opportunities to become productive members? Did our forefathers not travel across the oceans on ships, under difficult conditions, all seeking a better life in this land of opportunity? As long as there are opportunities for illegal low-paying jobs, there will be an illegal population waiting to fill that demand. So the way to curb this would be to plug those loopholes. And it is debate and discussion that will help us find ways to plug those loopholes. As far as government and state benefits go - especially basic health care and food - they should not be denied to any resident, legal or illegal. That is a fundamental human principle.

Throwing different ingredients together may cause a brief period of disharmony, as the differently sized ingredients brush against each other. But in the end, they all mesh into a cohesive whole and tasty salad.   The fact is that we have the freedom to debate both sides of the argument.  And that’s the definition of democracy.

Where we really fall short as a democracy is in the fields of basic health care and education. The US is a global leader in the fields of biomedical research and advances. Ironically in this same country, health care is neither affordable nor accessible to all its citizens. We are mired deep in layers of bureaucracy - more time is spent on paperwork (adding to un-necessary workforce costs) than on treating the actual illness. Are these cost-adding layers really necessary, and are they a useful tool to the progression of our society?

Our medical insurance system is reminiscent of a Mafia Don that terrorizes both the doctor and the patient.  If you don’t pay for protection (coverage in this case) - no health care for you! Even if you do agree to pay up, you are charged extra under the guise of labels like co-payments and deductibles. And if you have a pre-existing condition – why then you may be denied medical care altogether.

Likewise, if a doctor suggests treatment that is not cost-effective for the insurance, he is blacklisted. What doctor would dare go off the leash put on his by the insurance masters – it would be job suicide. It’s a sad state of affairs when basic medical care is driven by the profits of insurance giants at the expense of the health of our nation.

The irony is that there are developing countries out there that have a better medical care system than us. India is one such example. There are free public hospitals and small private clinics all over the cities. Service is quick and painless (maybe long waitlines in the lobby due to sheer populalation size. The doctor usually knows his patients so well that, many times he charges less for patients whom he knows are not economically well off, or helps them with cost of buying medicines by giving them free medical samples. Primary health care is so easy and so affordable. Many doctors routinely volunteer in rural and low-income areas and offer free health care. All these things are the sign of a humane society. Can the US doctors’ even dream of such a situation and would the insurance companies even allow them to do that? High quality surgeries and other medical procedures (e.g.: bypass surgeries) are so affordable by world-standards that there is now a booming medical tourism industry in India.

Health is both a physical and mental phenomena. Our health care has become too robotic and there is less and less human interaction in care. If a concerned and known ear accompanies the pills, recovery times would be quicker and last longer. Maybe there would even be less mental conditions such as depression in our society.

Our (US) research labs discover and market most modern medicines, yet these same medicines are less expensive outside the US. Our own citizens prefer to buy them from Canada and Mexico. It is a sad day in our country’s history when people have to run to other countries for affordable medical care and medicines.

It’s apparent that we’re ahead on the technology, knowledge and science but we kick on the delivery. Does it not then seem logical that we need to start by overhauling insurance in order to transform basic health care in our country?

And we have been through such other periods in our history. There was a time when factory owners exploited workers. It was always more profitable to have less safety standards or employ child labor. But was it the right thing to do? Debate and discussion resulted in enactment of Labor Laws and changed the face of the modern workplace. That’s freedom of expression at work!

Similarly, free Public Education is a wonderful idea in American society. It has helped generations of new immigrants integrate into our country.  We have made sure that every child in this country gets the chance at an education. Not all countries are able to pull this off.

Where we lack is that the quality of education is not uniform throughout the country. Our teachers help shape the next generation of American adults and visionaries, yet they are paid a pittance. Talented workforce will be attracted to this profession only if compensated well.  Isn’t this a worthwhile investment in our children’s future? And poor teaching in poor neighborhoods just breeds the vicious cycle of school dropouts, unemployment, and crime.

Even as we have ensured a free public education up to the high school level, our tertiary education has become unaffordable and therefore inaccessible for most people. This affects our competitiveness in the global market, especially given that we have top-notch university education available right at home. Our industries draw brilliant minds from across the globe. Ironically, we have so many more at home, just deprived of that opportunity to shine in that field.  Affordable college is again a critical investment in our country’s future.

Education itself is currently too narrowly defined. It is not merely learning to decode words that are written. It is not merely learning math and sciences either. Many students move through the education system without even grasping the applications and possibilities of what they learn, such that they can utilize it throughout their lives. Education has to move away from regurgitating facts to really having an appreciation of the subjects taught.

Education is the promenade of life. We have to prepare young minds to be responsible adults by also instilling “education in human values.” As a society, we can then, only progress from strength to strength.

What an absolutely profound concept – “Freedom of Expression”  - set in the framework of our constitution. And it has survived over 200 years. Let us not abuse it, but use it to mold the future of our country and the world. Our democracy will evolve and thrive as we uphold and continue to use this fundamental right.

My vision is one where there is peace amongst mankind and where every citizen is a contributing member of society in his own small way– in our country and globally.

It’s a definite possibility!