Showing posts with label Gatekeeping. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gatekeeping. Show all posts

Hostile Attribution Bias in Autism

Hostile attribution bias refers to the tendency to interpret others' ambiguous behaviors as having hostile intent. For instance, if someone accidentally bumps into a person with hostile attribution bias, they might assume it was done on purpose rather than an accident. This cognitive bias often leads to increased aggression and conflict in social interactions as the individual responds defensively or aggressively to perceived threats that may not actually exist.

Research on hostile attribution bias has predominantly focused on its prevalence in populations with externalizing behaviors, such as aggression and conduct disorders.  However, given the social communication challenges and the difficulty in interpreting social cues that are characteristic of autism, it is plausible that hostile attribution bias, could play a role in their social interactions.

Indeed, research suggests autistics [1] were more likely to interpret ambiguous social situations as hostile compared to their neurotypical peers. This tendency was linked to higher levels of social anxiety and other maladaptive (including aggression and SIB) behavior in these children.

However this hostile attribution bias, should not just be the attributed to the fact of disability, a.k.a, "difficulty in interpreting social cues in autism." It could well be the product of a lifetime of societal stigma and bias; exclusion, discrimination and misunderstanding. Research in social psychology supports the notion that chronic exposure to negative social experiences can shape cognitive and emotional responses. For individuals who consistently face these challenges, it is not uncommon to develop a heightened sensitivity to potential threats or hostile intentions in social interactions. They develop a lack of trust that people and systems around them will help them. This heightened sensitivity can manifest as hostile attribution bias, where even ambiguous or benign actions by others are interpreted as intentionally harmful or malicious. 

So the context of autism, individuals often face a unique set of social challenges and stigmatization, which can compound their difficulties in interpreting social cues. Studies have shown that individuals with autism are frequently subjected to social rejection, and misunderstandings [2]. 

And this stigma, exclusion and gatekeeping of opportunities for autistics tends to be even more pronounced, the more disabled you are seen, especially for autistics with externalizing behaviors and communication issues. It starts at a very early age where you are deemed incapable of learning and placed in a low expectations educational system which just deepens a self-fulfilling prophesy. You quickly learn the educators and educational system who's role was to educate and nurture you, are the often the very people who will gatekeep access to education itself.  The autistic is to blame for not improving, the onus is never on the educators or professionals involved. Autism is a huge profit making machine where millions benefit (fame, books, papers); everyone except the autistic.

These repeated negative interactions can reinforce a worldview where social threats are perceived as more prevalent, leading to increased hostile attribution bias. The combination of social communication difficulties inherent in autism and the external societal stigma creates a fertile ground for developing such cognitive biases [2], which only adds to their mental health toll. 
------------------------------------

References

  • 1. White, S. W., Ollendick, T., & Bray, B. C. (2011). College students on the autism spectrum: Prevalence and associated problems. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 15(6), 683-701.
  • 2. Zablotsky, B., Bradshaw, C. P., Anderson, C. M., & Law, P. A. (2014). The association between bullying and the psychological functioning of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 35(2), 106-116.