Showing posts with label Neuroscience of Autism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Neuroscience of Autism. Show all posts

Blindsight and its relevance to Autism

Autism Lexicon: Blindsight

Blindsight refers to the residual visual capabilities in individuals with damage to the primary visual cortex, allowing them to respond to visual stimuli without conscious perception. Its relevance to autism lies in investigating the potential for similar dissociations between conscious and subconscious sensory processing in autistic individuals.[Read More: Academic/Scientific Audience ]

PlainSpeak: Blindsight is a phenomenon where people with certain types of brain damage can respond to visual stimuli without consciously seeing them. Its connection to autism involves exploring how sensory information might be processed differently in both conditions, sometimes without conscious awareness. [Read more: PlainSpeak Plain Language for Lay Audience]



Understanding Neurophysiological and Neurobiological Perspectives in Autism

When discussing autism, we often focus on behaviors—how someone communicates or interacts with others. However, to truly understand autism, it’s important to look deeper into the brain's functioning. Neurophysiological and neurobiological perspectives offer insights into the brain's activity and structure in autism.

Neurophysiology: The Brain in Action

Neurophysiology refers to the study of the brain's electrical and chemical processes. In simpler terms, it looks at how the brain functions in real time. For autistics, neurophysiology can explain why sensory experiences might feel more intense or overwhelming. Research using EEG has shown that autistic brains often respond differently to sensory stimuli, with variations in brain wave patterns that suggest heightened sensitivity or delayed processing . This difference in neural activity can contribute to sensory overload and the need for certain sensory accommodations.

Neurobiology: The Brain's Structure and Development

Neurobiology, on the other hand, examines the brain's physical structure, development, and genetics. It looks at the brain's "hardware"—its neurons, synapses, and the genes that influence its development. In autism, neurobiological studies have found variations in brain regions involved in social behavior and emotion processing, such as the amygdala and prefrontal cortex . These differences can affect how autistic individuals perceive and respond to social stimuli, contributing to the diverse range of social behaviors seen in autism.

Genetic research also plays a significant role in neurobiology. Many studies have identified genes associated with autism, highlighting the genetic underpinnings that contribute to brain development and function . These insights are crucial for understanding the diverse expressions of autism and for developing personalized approaches to support autistic individuals.

Bridging Neurophysiology and Neurobiology

Combining neurophysiological and neurobiological perspectives provides a more comprehensive understanding of autism. For example, if an autistic person has a neurobiological difference in the connectivity between brain regions involved in emotion processing, this might lead to a neurophysiological response that is heightened or atypical when encountering emotional or social cues.

References

  1. Orekhova, E. V., Stroganova, T. A., Nyström, P., & Gillberg, C. (2006). Excess of high frequency electroencephalogram oscillations in boys with autism. Biological Psychiatry, 62(9), 1022-1029.
  2. Schumann, C. M., & Amaral, D. G. (2006). Stereological analysis of amygdala neuron number in autism. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(29), 7674-7679.
  3. Geschwind, D. H. (2011). Genetics of autism spectrum disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(9), 409-416.


Alexithymia and Interoception in Autism

Alexithymia is a term used to describe individuals who have difficulty recognizing and articulating their emotions. This condition can lead to significant challenges in emotional expression and interpersonal relationships. Those with alexithymia often struggle to identify their own emotions and may have trouble describing them to others, which can hinder effective communication and emotional connection.

Interoception refers to the perception and awareness of internal bodily states. It involves the ability to sense and interpret physiological signals originating from within the body, such as hunger, thirst, heartbeat, temperature, respiration, and the need for bodily functions. Interoception is crucial for maintaining homeostasis and overall well-being as it allows an individual to respond appropriately to bodily needs and emotional states. This internal sensory system plays a significant role in emotional experiences and self-regulation by linking physical sensations with emotional responses.

And yes, both can co-exist in autism.  

Autistics often exhibit atypical interoceptive awareness, which can be either heightened or diminished. This variance can lead to unique challenges, such as difficulty identifying states of discomfort or illness, or misinterpreting signals of emotional changes, which are critical for social interactions and personal health management.

For example, autistics might find it difficult to recognize a sensation of fullness to prevent overeating or to feel a racing heartbeat when anxious. Moreover, atypical interoceptive awareness can affect pain perception, complicating healthcare experiences. An injection might feel more painful than usual, or a lack of reaction to pain might make it appear to healthcare providers that there is no injury or less pain. Additionally, autistics might confuse a racing heartbeat resulting from exercise (a positive physical activity) with a racing heartbeat due to fear or anxiety, leading to difficulties in emotional and physical self-regulation.

Furthermore, atypical interoceptive awareness can result in challenges such as delayed toilet training. Recognizing the need for bodily functions like urination may be delayed, inconsistent or unclear, leading to practical and social difficulties like random incontinence even in adulthood. 

From a neuroscience perspective, the insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) are critical regions involved in interoception. The insula integrates interoceptive signals with emotinal and cognitive processes, while the ACC is associated with the emotional experience of pain. In individuals with autism, atypical functioning in these brain areas can contribute to altered interoceptive processing and emotional awareness. For example, fMRI studies have shown differences in insula activation in response to interoceptive tasks in autism, which may underpin the atypical interoceptive awareness observed clinically.

Impaired interoceptive awareness can exacerbate the challenges faced by individuals with alexithymia, making it harder to connect emotional experiences with physiological responses. Consequently, addressing both alexithymia and interoception is crucial for enhancing emotional intelligence and overall well-being. Research indicates that improving interoceptive skills may offer a pathway to better emotional regulation and awareness, fostering improved interpersonal connections and emotional health.

2 Versions of this article: 

Related Posts on #Interoception, #Alexithymia


Understanding Autistic Inertia

PlainSpeak. In Plain Language for the Lay Audience

Newton's Law of Inertia

Newton's Law of Inertia says that an object will stay still if it's already still, and if it's moving, it will keep moving in the same direction and speed unless something makes it change.

Autistic Inertia

We use this idea to describe how some autistic people have trouble starting or stopping tasks.

  • Starting Tasks: Just like an object at rest, some autistic people find it hard to begin tasks. They might feel stuck and need something to help them get going.

  • Stopping Tasks: Once they start a task, it can be hard to stop. They might keep doing the same thing over and over, like being stuck in a loop.

This difficulty also affects:

  • Switching Between Tasks: Changing from one activity to another can be tough.
  • Adjusting to Changes: Adapting to new environments or situations can be challenging.
  • Maintaining Focus: Staying focused on a task can be hard, but so can switching off that focus when needed.
  • Decision Making and Planning: Making decisions, planning, and following through with plans can be difficult.
  • Mental Health: Anxiety and depression can make these challenges worse.

Even if someone knows they need to start or stop a task, they might feel stuck and unable to do so, which can be exhausting. This can lead to burnout, where they feel completely worn out.

Causes

Autistic inertia can be caused by:

  • Sensory Overload: Too much sensory input can make it hard to start or stop tasks.
  • Motor Issues: Problems with movement and coordination.
  • Executive Dysfunction: Difficulty with planning and organizing.
  • Anxiety: High levels of anxiety can make these challenges worse.

This can make it hard to finish tasks, meet deadlines, and stick to a schedule for work or school, often leading to burnout.

Advantages

Sometimes, autistic inertia can help with hyper-focus, allowing someone to deeply concentrate on learning a specific topic.

Misconceptions

Autistic inertia is often misunderstood as laziness or lack of motivation. It can affect anyone, regardless of their support needs or ability to speak. It can be even more complex for those with movement issues, sensory challenges, and coordination problems.

What Can Help

To help manage autistic inertia:

  • Use Reminders: Set reminders on your watch or calendar.
  • Get Support: Ask others for help when needed.

Everyone’s needs are different, so the type and amount of help will vary from person to person.

Who Autism Research Leaves Out

I find that despite all the careers, promotions, and profits being made by thousands of autism-experts, the state of autism interventions right now is one hot mess. In reality, there still are no real “experts” in autism because there is no one-size fits all model.
-Hari Srinivasan, Time

 

Weak Central Coherence Theory of Autism

Caveat: There is no single theory that can fully explain autism. 

The Weak Central Coherence Theory posits that autistics exhibit a cognitive processing style characterized by a propensity for local over global information processing. This theory suggests that autistics have a heightened focus on fine details at the expense of integrating these details into a coherent whole. 

The Weak Central Coherence Theory provides a framework for understanding the distinct cognitive processing style in autism, characterized by a bias toward local over global processing. Neurobiological evidence supports this theory, showing enhanced local processing capabilities and impaired global integration due to altered neural connectivity. This theory helps explain the strengths and challenges faced by individuals with autism in various cognitive and social domains.

Key Concepts

  1. Detail-Focused Processing:

    • Cognitive Tendency: Autistics demonstrate superior performance on tasks requiring attention to fine details, suggesting an enhanced local processing bias.
    • Neurobiological Basis: Neuroimaging studies indicate increased activation in primary and secondary sensory cortices, particularly the visual cortex, which may underlie this enhanced local processing.
  2. Reduced Global Integration:

    • Cognitive Deficit: There is a relative impairment in synthesizing details into a unified, overarching context, which affects higher-order cognitive tasks.
    • Neurobiological Basis: This deficit is associated with reduced long-range connectivity and synchronization between frontal and posterior brain regions, impairing the integration of information across neural networks.
  3. Neuroanatomical Correlates:

    • Prefrontal Cortex: Involvement in executive functions and global processing is diminished, contributing to difficulties in integrating complex information.
    • Posterior Regions: Including the occipital and parietal lobes, these regions exhibit enhanced local processing but reduced integration with other cortical areas.

Examples and Implications

  1. Perceptual Tasks:

    • Enhanced Performance: Autistic individuals often excel at visual search tasks, identifying small differences in stimuli more quickly and accurately than neurotypical individuals.
    • Impaired Performance: They may struggle with tasks that require understanding the overall context, such as interpreting ambiguous figures or scenes.
  2. Cognitive Tasks:

    • Strengths: Detail-oriented tasks like pattern recognition or mechanical assembly are areas of strength.
    • Weaknesses: Tasks requiring abstract thinking, such as comprehending proverbs or making inferences, present challenges due to impaired global processing.
  3. Social Interaction:

    • Implications: Social difficulties can arise from an inability to integrate social cues into a cohesive understanding of social interactions. This can lead to literal interpretations of language and difficulties with nonverbal communication.

Neuroimaging Evidence

  1. Functional MRI (fMRI):
    • Findings: fMRI studies show atypical activation patterns in the frontal and parietal regions during tasks requiring global processing.
  2. Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI):
    • Findings: DTI studies indicate atypical white matter integrity, suggesting disrupted long-range connectivity essential for global information integration.
  3. EEG/MEG:
    • Findings: EEG and MEG studies reveal reduced coherence and synchronization across distant brain regions, supporting the notion of impaired global processing.
Two Versions of this post


Who Autism Research Leaves Out

"It’s time for researchers and technologists to rethink their methodologies and technologies, and explore other innovative approaches to give all members of the autistic community the care we need."
-Hari Srinivasan, Time

 

Exploring Short-Term Synaptic Plasticity and Its Implications in Autism

Short-term synaptic plasticity, a temporary change in synaptic strength lasting from seconds to minutes, is a crucial mechanism for neural communication and information processing. Two key types of short-term plasticity are paired pulse facilitation (PPF) and paired pulse depression (PPD). Understanding these mechanisms can provide insight into the molecular & genetic underpinnings of autism.

Paired Pulse Facilitation (PPF) occurs when two signals (pulses) arrive in quick succession at a synapse, with the second pulse producing a stronger response than the first. This is due to residual calcium (Ca2+) remaining in the presynaptic terminal after the first pulse, which enhances neurotransmitter release upon the arrival of the second pulse. This phenomenon is particularly significant at synapses with low initial release probability, ensuring that enough neurotransmitters are available for subsequent release.

Paired Pulse Depression (PPD), on the other hand, is characterized by a diminished response to the second pulse. This occurs at synapses with high initial release probability, where the first pulse depletes the readily releasable pool of neurotransmitters, leaving insufficient resources for the second pulse. The timing between the pulses is critical; if the interval is too long, Ca2+ dissipates, and vesicles are replenished, mitigating these effects.

In the context of autism, alterations in short-term plasticity have been linked to the disorder's characteristic neural and behavioral features. Research has shown that mutations in synaptic genes such as SYN1 and SYN2, which regulate synaptic vesicle dynamics, can disrupt short-term plasticity. These mutations result in increased PPF at excitatory synapses and enhanced synaptic depression at inhibitory synapses, leading to an excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) imbalance that contributes to network hyperexcitability and altered neuronal communication (Frontiers, 2015)​ (Frontiers)​.

Furthermore, neuroligin-3 mutations, associated with autism, have been found to differentially alter synaptic function in the hippocampus and cortex. These mutations can increase inhibitory synaptic transmission and disrupt endocannabinoid signaling, further impacting short-term plasticity and neural circuitry (Molecular Psychiatry, 2015)​ (Nature)​. These findings underscore the significant role of short-term plasticity in maintaining neural circuit function and how its disruption can contribute to pathogenesis.

2 versions of this post

For the Academic/Scientific Audience

PlainSpeak in plain language for the lay reader



The Role of Parvalbumin Neurons in Autism

A PlainSpeak version for the Lay Reader

The Role of Parvalbumin Neurons in Autism

Background

Scientists believe that a special type of brain cell called Parvalbumin (PV) interneurons (INs) may play a key role in autism. Even though autism can be caused by many different genetic and environmental factors, people with autism often show similar behaviors. This suggests that there might be a common issue in the brain across different individuals with autism (1).

Understanding the role of PV+ interneurons in autism helps us see why many symptoms of autism occur, like sensory sensitivity and seizures. 

The Balance of Brain Signals

Our brains need a balance between "go" signals (excitation) and "stop" signals (inhibition) to work properly. In autism, it was first thought that there is too much excitation and not enough inhibition, leading to an imbalance. This imbalance could explain why some people with autism have seizures (4,5). However, this idea is too simple because many types of brain cells are involved in maintaining this balance.

What We Know About PV+ Cells in Autism

Researchers have found that PV+ cells in the brains of autistics are often not working as they should:

  • Fewer PV+ cells: There are fewer of these cells in the brain, and they produce less of a protein called parvalbumin.
  • Changes in brain waves: These cells help control brain waves called gamma oscillations. In autism, the power of these gamma waves is higher than normal.
  • Reduced activity: PV+ cells show less activity in response to visual signals.

PV+ cells are the most common type of inhibitory ("stop/slow down") neuron in the brain, but other types of neurons may also be involved in autism.

Brain Excitability and Sensory Sensitivity

When PV+ cells don't function properly, the brain becomes overly excitable and synchronized, making seizures more likely. This can also cause exaggerated responses to sensory inputs, like touch or sound. For example, in a mouse model of autism, the response to whisker movement is weaker in certain brain cells.

Sensory Overload

Autistics often experience sensory overload because their brains can't tune out irrelevant information. This may be due to a failure of brain cells to adapt to continuous stimulation (2).

Visual Processing

PV+ neurons are important for fine-tuning the way we see things, helping us to distinguish between different visual inputs.

Brain Waves and Communication

Increased gamma wave activity, which is linked to sensory and communication issues, is common in autism. PV+ cells help generate these waves, and their dysfunction leads to irregular brain activity patterns (3).


2 Versions of this Post

For the Science/Academic Reader

PlainSpeak for the Lay Reader

A short definition




References

  • 1.Contractor, A., Klyachko, V. A., & Portera-Cailliau, C. (2021). Reduced density and activity of parvalbumin interneurons in autism. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 13(1), 1-15.
  • 2.Green, S. A., & Gu, Y. (2015). Sensory hypersensitivity in autism spectrum disorders. Current Biology, 25(18), R876-R879.
  • 3.Guyon, N., & Nahmani, M. (2021). Role of parvalbumin interneurons in gamma oscillations and sensory processing in autism. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15, 692872.
  • 4. Hussman, J. P. (2001). Suppressed GABAergic inhibition as a common factor in suspected etiologies of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(2), 247-248.
  • 5. Rubenstein, J. L., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Model of autism: Increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 2(5), 255-267.

E-I Imbalance Theory of Autism

The E-I Imbalance hypothesis posits that an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling in the brain contributes to the sensory, cognitive, and behavioral features of autism.

PlainSpeak: This idea says that a mix-up between signals that excite and calm the brain can cause the sensory, thinking, and behavior issues in autism.


Read in more detail about E-I Imbalance


Understanding the E - I Imbalance Theory of Autism

In PlainSpeak for the Lay Reader
Caveat: Always keep in mind there is no single theory that perfectly explains autism.

The Excitatory-Inhibition (E-I) Imbalance idea says that a mix-up between signals that excite and calm the brain can cause the sensory, thinking, and behavior issues in autism.

What Can Cause the E-I Imbalance?

Too Much Glutamate and Overactive Exciting Neurons
Glutamate is the main chemical that makes brain cells more active. If there is too much glutamate or the exciting neurons are too active, it can make the brain overly excitable. This can cause people with autism to be very sensitive to sounds, lights, and other sensory inputs and make thinking and processing information harder.

Not Enough GABA to Calm the Brain
GABA is the main chemical that calms brain cells. In autism, there can be less GABA, problems with GABA receptors, or less active calming neurons. This means the brain doesn’t have enough calming signals to balance the exciting ones, making the E-I imbalance worse.

Problems with Exciting and Calming Neurons
Neurons are the cells in the brain that send and receive signals. Exciting neurons make other neurons more active, while calming neurons reduce activity. In autism, there might be differences in the number, function, or connections of these neurons. For example, changes in certain calming neurons can disrupt the brain’s local circuits, leading to more excitement and less calming.

Important Development Periods
The E-I balance is especially important during key development times when the brain is growing and changing rapidly. If the balance is off during these times, it can affect brain development and function in the long term. This can impact learning, memory, and the formation of proper brain connections.

Changes in Synaptic Proteins

Proteins like neuroligins and neurexins help brain cells stick together and send signals. In autism, changes or problems with these proteins can lead to abnormal connections between brain cells, affecting the E-I balance.

Ion Channel Problems
Ion channels help neurons send signals by letting ions in and out. Ions are tiny charged particles, like sodium, potassium, or calcium, that neurons need to function properly. In autism, problems with these ion channels can change how neurons send signals, affecting the E-I balance.

Problems with Synaptic Plasticity
Synaptic plasticity is the ability of connections between brain cells to get stronger or weaker over time. This is important for learning and memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP) is when these connections get stronger with activity, helping with learning new things. Long-term depression (LTD) is when these connections get weaker, which helps remove unnecessary information. In autism, problems with LTP and LTD can make it harder to learn and remember things.

Role of Supporting Brain Cells (Astrocytes and Microglia)
Astrocytes and microglia are supporting cells in the brain that help maintain E-I balance. Astrocytes manage levels of glutamate and GABA, while microglia help prune synapses during development. Pruning is like trimming a tree; it removes extra connections between brain cells to make the network more efficient. Problems with these cells can lead to too much excitation or not enough inhibition.

Genetic and Epigenetic Factors
Our genes, which are like instructions for how our body works, can influence the E-I balance. Changes in how these genes are turned on or off can also affect the brain. Many genes linked to autism affect how brain cells connect and communicate, leading to differences seen in autism.

Environmental Influences
Things in the environment, like exposure to toxins, infections, and stress during pregnancy, can impact the E-I balance. These factors can change how the brain develops and works, leading to long-term effects on brain signals.

Excitation/Inhibition Imbalance in Autism Rodent Models

E/I IMBALANCE AND AUTISTIC-LIKE BEHAVIORS:
  • Optogenetic stimulation of pyramidal neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex in mice induces social deficits associated with enhanced gamma oscillations.
  • Increased neocortical E/I ratio caused by malfunctions of PV-expressing interneurons induces excessive gamma oscillations and autistic-like behaviors.

Factors Contributing to E/I Imbalance
  • E/I balance at the circuit level involves the interplay between GABAergic interneurons and target pyramidal neurons, modulating long-range connections.
Excitatory Synapse Development
  • Neuroligin and neurexin genes play critical roles in synapse and circuit development.
  • Knockout of 4E-BP2 in mice upregulates neuroligins, increases hippocampal synaptic E/I ratio, and induces autistic-like behaviors.
  • Pharmacologic inhibition of eIF4E or knockdown of neuroligin-1 normalizes the E/I ratio and rescues autistic-like behaviors.
AMPAR 
  • Ampakine rescues impaired long-term potentiation and long-term memory in Ube3a-deficient mice, a model of Angelman syndrome.
  • Various gene mutations affect AMPAR transmission and synaptic functions in different mouse models.
  • IGF-1 treatment rescues reduced excitatory transmission in Shank3 and Mecp2 mice.
NMDAR
  • Mutations in genes like Nlgn1, Shank2, and Tbr1 lead to NMDAR hypofunction and social deficits in mice.
  • Both hypo- and hyperfunction of NMDARs can cause autistic-like behaviors in animal models.
  • mGluR5 hyperfunction in Fmr1 and BTBR mice is implicated in ASDs.
Signaling Pathways
  • The mTOR pathway and actin-modulatory pathways play crucial roles in rescuing autistic-like phenotypes in animal models.
  • Dopamine receptor agonists/antagonists and 5-hydroxytryptamine rescue behaviors in various mouse models.
Inhibitory Synapse Development and Function
  • Deletion of inhibitory synapse-specific Nlgn2 leads to decreased inhibitory synapse density and cognitive deficits.
  • Mutations in genes like Nlgn3 and Cntnap2 affect GABAergic transmission in different brain regions.
  • Deficiencies in GABA A receptor subunits and altered tonic GABAergic transmission are observed in ASD model animals.
Interneurons
  • PV interneurons are crucial for regulating gamma oscillations and are associated with psychiatric disorders.
  • Defects in PV, SST, and NPY interneurons lead to various phenotypes in mouse models.
  • Reduced interneuronal firing and GABAergic output contribute to social and cognitive deficits in ASD models.
Glial Cells
  • Astrocytes and nonastrocytic glial cells like microglia and oligodendrocytes play roles in regulating excitatory synapse structure and function.
  • Re-expression of MeCP2 in glial cells can restore disease-related phenotypes in ASD models.
Intrinsic Neuronal Excitability
  • Deficits in dendritic ion channels and intrinsic excitability are observed in various mouse models.
  • Neuregulin-ErbB4 signaling modulates the intrinsic excitability of PV interneurons.Homeostatic 
Synaptic Plasticity
  • Fmr1 mice show altered synaptic scaling in different brain regions.
  • GKAP/DLGAP1/SAPAP1 scaffold regulates bidirectional synaptic scaling in the hippocampus.

Temporal E/I Regulation
  • Temporal changes in E/I balance are crucial for normal brain development.
  • Early interventions with specific inhibitors can normalize E/I balance and rescue abnormal phenotypes in animal models.
  • Delayed restoration of certain genes can also rescue abnormal phenotypes in ASD models.

Perspectives
  • Careful interpretation of rescue results is necessary to understand the fundamental correction of pathogenic mechanisms.

Lee, E., Lee, J., & Kim, E. (2017). Excitation/inhibition imbalance in animal models of autism spectrum disorders. Biological psychiatry81(10), 838-847.

      MTT Mental Time Travel

      Mental Time Travel (MTT) refers to the cognitive ability to mentally project oneself backward in time to recall past events or forward in time to anticipate future scenarios. In relation to autism, MTT research explores how individuals with autism may experience differences in episodic memory and future-oriented thinking, potentially leading to challenges in recalling specific personal events or imagining detailed future scenarios. [ Read in more detail on MTT]

      PlainSpeak: Mental Time Travel (MTT) is our brain’s way of thinking back to past memories or imagining what might happen in the future. For people with autism, MTT might work differently, sometimes making it harder to remember personal events or imagine future plans. [Read in more detail, a PlainSpeak Version]

      -------

      Related Posts: [Autism Theories], [Sensorimotor], [Neuroscience of Autism]

      Monotropism and Special Interests in Autism - a Neurocognitive Perspective

      Monotropism and special interests are closely related yet distinct constructs within the context of autism. Both concepts elucidate how autistic individuals exhibit profound engagement with specific domains, yet they underscore different facets of this phenomenon.

      Monotropism is a cognitive model positing that autistic individuals exhibit a narrowed attentional focus on a limited set of interests, in contrast to the broader attentional distribution observed in neurotypical individuals. This heightened attentional focus facilitates deep expertise and significant enjoyment in specialized areas. However, it also results in attentional inflexibility, making it challenging for individuals to shift focus to other tasks or interests that do not align with their core interests. Monotropism provides a framework for understanding why autistic individuals often demonstrate exceptional proficiency in their areas of passion but may face difficulties with tasks that are outside these focal points.

      Special Interests refer to the specific topics or activities that elicit intense focus and enthusiasm in autistic individuals. These interests often manifest as lifelong passions and serve as sources of comfort, identity, and competence. While special interests contribute positively to an autistic individual's life, they may be misunderstood or undervalued by others who fail to recognize their significance.

      Neurocognitive explanations for both monotropism and special interests suggest that these behaviors are underpinned by fundamental differences in brain function and information processing in autistic individuals. Monotropism is thought to involve an atypical allocation of cognitive resources, where autistic individuals preferentially allocate their cognitive bandwidth to areas of high personal significance. This preferential allocation can be understood through the lens of predictive coding theories, particularly those emphasizing 'slow-updating' and 'high-precision' or 'hypoprior' mechanisms. These theories propose that autistic individuals maintain highly precise and stable internal models for their areas of interest, leading to profound engagement and expertise in these domains but also to challenges in adapting to new or less predictable tasks.

      Special interests, on the other hand, may be conceptualized as emergent properties of these underlying neurocognitive mechanisms. The intense focus and enthusiasm associated with special interests reflect the heightened precision and stability of the predictive models governing these interests. The sustained engagement with special interests can be further understood through the framework of neural reward pathways, where dopaminergic activity reinforces behaviors that align with these precise internal models, thereby enhancing the salience and reward value of special interests.

      Understanding both monotropism and special interests from a neurocognitive perspective can inform the development of supportive environments that leverage the strengths of autistic individuals. By recognizing and building upon their focused cognitive styles, educators, clinicians, and caregivers can implement strategies that accommodate attentional inflexibility while fostering opportunities for growth and adaptation. This approach not only acknowledges the unique cognitive profiles of autistic individuals but also promotes their overall well-being and societal inclusion.

      Here are the different versions to help understand Monotropism and Special Interests 

      Neuroception - Safety Perception

      Autism Lexicon - Neuroception

      Neuroception is the brain's automatic process of evaluating environmental safety and threat levels, often dysregulated in autism, leading to heightened sensitivity to sensory input and potentially contributing to negative attribution bias and hostile attribution bias. [ Read in more detail on Neuroception here].

      PlainSpeak: Neuroception is how our brain unconsciously decides if we're safe or in danger. In autism, this process can be heightened, causing some people to see everyday situations as more threatening, which can affect how they respond to others. [ Read in more detail on Neurocepton here]. 


      Understanding Short-Term Brain Changes and Autism

      PlainSpeak Plain Language Version for the Lay Reader

      Our brains constantly change how neurons (nerve cells) communicate to help us learn and remember things. Some of these changes happen very quickly and are known as short-term synaptic plasticity. This is when the connection strength between two neurons changes for a few seconds to a few minutes. Two important types of these changes are paired pulse facilitation (PPF) and paired pulse depression (PPD).

      Paired Pulse Facilitation (PPF) happens when two signals arrive close together at a neuron connection, and the second signal is stronger than the first. This is because the first signal leaves behind some calcium, which helps release more chemical messengers for the second signal, making it stronger.

      Paired Pulse Depression (PPD) is the opposite. When two signals come close together, the second signal is weaker. This happens because the first signal uses up most of the available chemical messengers, leaving fewer for the second signal.

      These short-term changes are important for how our brains process information. In autism, scientists have found that these changes can be different. For example, certain gene mutations linked to autism can affect how well these short-term changes work. Some of these genes, like SYN1 and SYN2, help control the availability of chemical messengers at neuron connections. Mutations in these genes can lead to an imbalance in brain activity, making some signals too strong and others too weak (Frontiers, 2015)​ (Frontiers)​.

      Other studies have shown that mutations in another gene, neuroligin-3, which is also linked to autism, can change how neurons communicate in different parts of the brain. These mutations can increase the strength of certain signals and disrupt the balance of brain activity (Molecular Psychiatry, 2015)​ (Nature)​. This imbalance can contribute to some of the behaviors seen in autism.

      Understanding these short-term brain changes helps scientists learn more about how autism affects the brain and can lead to new ways to help people with autism.

      2 versions of this post

      For the Academic/Scientific Audience

      PlainSpeak in plain language for the lay reader



      LTP and LTD and their Role in Autism

      The Neuroscience of Autism 
      Long Term Potentiation (LTP),  Long Term Depression (LTD) and their role in Autism.

      LTP and LTD are critical forms of long term synaptic plasticity that underlie learning and memory. These processes are governed by Hebbian plasticity, a principle summarized as "cells that fire together, wire together." This means that the synaptic strength between two neurons increases when they are frequently active together (LTP), and decreases when they are less synchronized (LTD).

      Spike-Timing Dependent Plasticity (STDP), a form of Hebbian plasticity, emphasizes the precise timing of neuronal spikes:

      • LTP: Induced when a presynaptic neuron fires just before a postsynaptic neuron, typically within 20 milliseconds. This leads to a significant influx of calcium (Ca2+) through NMDA receptors and voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), strengthening the synapse.
      • LTD: Occurs when the postsynaptic neuron fires before the presynaptic neuron, usually within 20-100 milliseconds. This results in a weaker Ca2+ signal, leading to synaptic weakening.

      Research has revealed substantial alterations in LTP, LTD, and Hebbian plasticity in autism, providing insights into the neural mechanisms that contribute to autism’s cognitive and behavioral characteristics

      1. Hippocampal Dysfunction:

        • Studies on animal models, such as the BTBR mouse model of autism, show impaired hippocampal LTP. This impairment correlates with the learning and memory deficits commonly observed in autism (Rubenstein & Merzenich, 2003; Bourgeron, 2015)​ (Frontiers)​​ (Nature)​.
      2. Cerebellar Abnormalities:

        • Atypical LTD has been noted in the cerebellum, a region critical for motor control and coordination. This could underlie the motor deficits observed in autism (Fatemi et al., 2012)​ (Nature)​.
      3. Genetic Factors:

        • Mutations in synaptic genes such as SHANK3, NRXN1, and NLGN3, which are vital for maintaining synaptic plasticity, have been linked to autism. These mutations can disrupt the balance of LTP and LTD, leading to synaptic dysfunctions associated with autism (Durand et al., 2007; Südhof, 2008)​ (Frontiers)​​ (Nature)​.
      4. Neuromodulators:

        • Dopamine (DA) is a key neuromodulator that can modulate the direction and extent of synaptic changes. It acts through D1/D5 receptors to enhance LTP or through D2 receptors to promote LTD. This modulation is essential for adaptive learning and behavior in autism (Yagishita et al., 2014)​ (Frontiers)​.


      2 versions of this post

      PlainSpeak. Plain Language for the Lay Reader

      For the Academic/Scientific Audience



      References:

      • Rubenstein, J. L., & Merzenich, M. M. (2003). Model of autism: increased ratio of excitation/inhibition in key neural systems. Genes, Brain and Behavior, 2(5), 255-267.
      • Bourgeron, T. (2015). From the genetic architecture to synaptic plasticity in autism spectrum disorder. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(9), 551-563.
      • Fatemi, S. H., Aldinger, K. A., Ashwood, P., Bauman, M. L., Blaha, C. D., Blatt, G. J., ... & Welsh, J. P. (2012). Consensus paper: Pathological role of the cerebellum in autism. The Cerebellum, 11(3), 777-807.
      • Durand, C. M., Betancur, C., Boeckers, T. M., Bockmann, J., Chaste, P., Fauchereau, F., ... & Bourgeron, T. (2007). Mutations in the gene encoding the synaptic scaffolding protein SHANK3 are associated with autism spectrum disorders. Nature Genetics, 39(1), 25-27.
      • Südhof, T. C. (2008). Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature, 455(7215), 903-911.
      • Yagishita, S., Hayashi-Takagi, A., Ellis-Davies, G. C., Urakubo, H., Ishii, S., & Kasai, H. (2014). A critical time window for dopamine actions on the structural plasticity of dendritic spines. Science, 345(6204), 1616-1620.

      Active Sensing and Autism

      Neuroscience Concepts: 

      Active Sensing

      Active sensing refers to the process by which organisms actively control their sensory organs to acquire and process sensory information more effectively. In the context of multisensory integration, active sensing involves the coordination and adjustment of different sensory inputs based on motor actions to enhance the perception of the environment. For instance, moving the head or eyes to better see or hear a source of interest, or manipulating an object to better gauge its properties. This form of sensing is crucial because it allows an organism to integrate sensory information from various sources in a way that is aligned with current behavioral goals, thereby enhancing decision-making and interaction with the environment.

      In autistics, active sensing and multisensory integration can manifest differently compared to NTs. Research suggests that autistics may experience variations in how sensory information is integrated, leading to differences in perceiving and responding to the environment. For example:

      • Hypo- and Hypersensitivities: Autistic individuals often exhibit sensory sensitivities that can affect their active sensing behaviors. Hypersensitivities (over-responsiveness) might lead to avoidance of certain sensory inputs, while hyposensitivities (under-responsiveness) might lead to seeking out more intense sensory experiences. This can affect how they use active sensing in daily interactions.
      • Attention and Filtering: Differences in attentional mechanisms in autism can influence active sensing. Autistic individuals might have difficulty filtering out irrelevant sensory stimuli, leading to challenges in focusing on specific sensory inputs necessary for effective multisensory integration.
      • Motor Coordination and Planning: Difficulties with motor coordination and planning, commonly observed in autism, can also impact active sensing. If motor actions are less precise or more effortful, it may affect the ability to actively manipulate sensory inputs effectively.
      • Neural Processing Differences: Studies have shown differences in neural processing pathways involved in sensory perception in autism. Research has noted that autistic individuals might process sensory inputs in a more localized manner, potentially affecting the global integration of multisensory information (Marco et al., 2011)
      • Predictive Coding: Some theories, such as those involving predictive coding, suggest that autistics might have a different approach to anticipating sensory inputs, which impacts how sensory information is integrated and processed. This can lead to differences in how expected and unexpected stimuli are managed, further influencing active sensing behaviors.
      These differences highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of how multisensory integration and active sensing operate in autism. They also underscore the importance of creating environments and interventions that are sensitive to the unique sensory processing characteristics of autistic individuals, thereby supporting better integration of sensory information and more effective interaction with the world.

      Decoding the Excitatory-Inhibition Imbalance in Autism

      Caveat: Always keep in mind there is no single theory that perfectly explains autism.


      The Excitatory-Inhibition (E-I) Imbalance hypothesis posits that an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory signaling in the brain contributes to the sensory, cognitive, and behavioral features of autism.

      Factors that contribute to the E-I imbalance.

      Elevated Glutamate and Hyperactive Glutamatergic Neurons

      Glutamate is the primary excitatory neurotransmitter in the brain, and its excessive release or receptor overactivation can lead to heightened neuronal excitability. Research indicates that autistics have increased glutamate concentrations in certain brain regions, suggesting a hyper-excitable state that disrupts normal neural communication and network dynamics. This over-excitation can manifest in the form of heightened sensitivity to sensory stimuli and difficulties in cognitive processing.


      GABAergic Signaling Deficit

      GABA is the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, crucial for counterbalancing excitation. In autism, there is often a reduction in GABAergic signaling, whether through decreased GABA levels, impaired GABA receptor function, or reduced GABAergic neuron activity. This means that the inhibitory 'brake' on neuronal activity is weakened, failing to counteract the excessive excitation from glutamate, thus exacerbating the E-I imbalance.

      Imbalance in Pyramidal Neurons and Interneurons

      Pyramidal neurons are the primary excitatory cells in the cortex, while interneurons provide the necessary inhibitory control. In autism, there are differences in the density, function, and connectivity of these neuron types eg: alterations in the number or function of specific types of inhibitory interneurons, such as parvalbumin-positive (PV+) interneurons. These changes disrupt the local circuitry, leading to an overall increase in excitation and reduced inhibition.

      Critical Developmental Periods

      E-I imbalance is particularly impactful during critical developmental periods when the brain is highly plastic and sensitive to changes. Early disruptions in E-I balance can have long-lasting effects on brain development and function. During these periods, the maturation of both excitatory and inhibitory circuits is crucial for establishing proper neural networks. If the E-I balance is skewed, it can impair synaptic plasticity, cortical maturation, and the formation of functional neural circuits, contributing to the developmental trajectory of autism.

      Alterations in Synaptic Proteins

      Changes in the expression or function of synaptic proteins play a critical role in E-I imbalance. Proteins such as neuroligins and neurexins, which are involved in synaptic adhesion and signaling, have been implicated in autism. Mutations or dysregulation of these proteins can lead to atypical synapse formation and function, contributing to an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory synapses.

      Ion Channel Dysfunction

      Ion channels are essential for maintaining the proper function of neurons. Dysfunctions in ion channels, such as those involving sodium, potassium, and calcium, can alter neuronal excitability. In autism, mutations in genes encoding these ion channels (e.g., SCN2A, KCNQ2) have been identified, leading to altered action potential generation and propagation, thereby affecting the E-I balance.

      Impaired Synaptic Plasticity

      Synaptic plasticity, the ability of synapses to strengthen or weaken over time, is crucial for learning and memory. Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) are key mechanisms of synaptic plasticity that depend on a delicate E-I balance. In autism, impairments in LTP and LTD have been observed, suggesting that the capacity for synaptic change is disrupted, further contributing to cognitive and behavioral challenges.

      Role of Astrocytes and Microglia

      Astrocytes and microglia, types of glial cells, also play significant roles in maintaining E-I balance. Astrocytes regulate neurotransmitter levels, including glutamate and GABA, by uptake and recycling processes. Dysregulation of astrocyte function can lead to excess glutamate and insufficient GABA, exacerbating E-I imbalance. Microglia, the brain's immune cells, are involved in synaptic pruning during development. Abnormal microglial activity can lead to either excessive or insufficient synaptic pruning, disrupting the E-I balance and normal brain connectivity.

      Genetic and Epigenetic Factors

      Genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications can influence E-I balance. Numerous genes associated with autism are involved in synaptic function, neurotransmitter systems, and neuronal development. Additionally, epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, can alter gene expression patterns related to E-I balance. These genetic and epigenetic factors contribute to the heterogeneity observed in autism, affecting the degree and nature of E-I imbalance across individuals.

      Environmental Influences

      Environmental factors, including prenatal exposure to toxins, infections, and stress, can impact E-I balance. These factors can alter the development of neural circuits and neurotransmitter systems, leading to long-term changes in excitatory and inhibitory signaling. Understanding the interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental influences is crucial for comprehending the full picture of E-I imbalance in autism.

      Weak Central Coherence Theory of Autism

      Autism Lexicon: Weak Central Coherence (WCC) Theory

      The WCC Theory is a cognitive theory of autism (cognitive theories try to explain how autistics think). 

      It suggests that  autistics focus on noticing details but might struggle with seeing the bigger picture. This affects how they see and understand the world around them. This unique way of thinking brings both strengths and challenges, affecting everyday tasks, social interactions, and work or hobbies.

      Read about WCC in more detail 

      -------