Which Mind Bodies have Access to the Land?

Last semester I took Prof Sunaura Taylor's Env Science Policy & Management, Disability Studies course. In Prof Taylor's words, "This course centers the body as a key analytic to understanding the more-than-human world." An absolutely intriguing course. 

My Final Project

=====

San Francisco - Which Mind Bodies Have Access to the Land?

Key Idea How postmodern cities (like San Francisco) are built for white, wealthy, able-bodied people and how inaccessible cities can be, including accessing “nature”

Eduardo Jacobo and I teamed up for this project and have looked at San Francisco from a few different perspectives as has been discussed in class: what constitutes Natural Beauty, the concrete jungle nature of the built environment in terms of accessibility (eg: city of slopes with some of the steepest roads in the world) and more. Which mind-bodies have access?

Our (Project) Creation Story

I have always felt uneasy and out of place in big cities; a trip to the beach is so much more enjoyable to me than going inside buildings, no matter how magnificent they are. My initial idea for the project was a big city or maybe a marketplace in India since I was there (the India idea came later but I’d already started working with Eddie by then). When Eddie initially mentioned he would be taking photos of San Francisco, it sounded like a perfect collaboration as it would add visuals to my thoughts on aspects of San Francisco I had in mind - I was especially interested in photos/visuals of steep roads, the manmade Golden Gate bridge juxtaposed against nature, walking in the shadows of tall skyscrapers and displaying the inaccessibility of the built concrete jungle. The plan thus was that he would take the photos and I would write a poetry-prose narrative around them. (We will each be handing in a separate personal reflection expanding on these ideas in the context of what was discussed in class.)

In addition, “collaboration-cooperation” was all the more relevant for me given that this was a disability-studies class. I’d first heard of this term during my interview with Judy Heumann for the Daily Cal, (Srinivasan, 2019) and it has stuck with me since.

“Collaboration-Cooperation” The legendary disability rights activist Judy Heumann stresses the importance of “collaboration-cooperation” (within and outside disability)  in order for us to be moving forward. This team effort between Hari (disabled) and Eddie attempts to carry forth this spirit of “collaboration-cooperation.” Extending this relationship to the land.

We can extend this “collaboration-cooperation” to the relationship we humans need to have with the land we exist on and our fellow non-human and nonliving things. It has to be a treaty with the land, following in the footsteps of the Skywoman; the indeginous struggle is really a struggle for all earth given that the mess we’ve managed to make of the earth.

“If we, collectively, want to fight climate crises, then we need to reclaim land-based ethics….driven by the immediate needs of the land, not peoples….Indigenous peoples are cueing others to recognize an earth-centered metaphysic, an interconnected and sentient reality...Indigenous peoples are not only still fighting for their land, they’re fighting for the protection of all lands” (Avalos, 2021)

A Land Acknowledgement.

Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo

We acknowledge that the city of San Francisco sits on the unceded, ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula.

Before the missionaries and the White man

Lived peoples of Ramaytush Ohlone 

From the time of Sky Woman.

Treaties with living and nonliving.

Harmonized with the land.

Everything, a cherished relative.

Imprisoned, All but wiped out presently.

“It is good to remember that the original (Skywoman) was herself an immigrant… It was through her actions of reciprocity, the give and take with this land, that the original immigrant became indigenous,” ( Kimmerer, 2016).

Though I was born here, as the child of immigrant parents, one is almost thought to think of America as primarily a White culture that has always been here. Only after coming to Berkeley, have I realised how important a land acknowledgement is to the original immigrants, while keeping in mind that this is but a starting point.

Even today, one of the fundamental aspects of settler colonialism is to superimpose their culture and ideas on top of indigenous culture so the new ways became the right way, and the old ways the wrong ways that needed to be eliminated and forgotten. In America this took the form of multiculturalism which meant indigenous people were reduced from treaty-holding independent nations to yet another minority that supposedly contributed to America's greatness with their giving spirit, (Dunbar-Ortiz, 2015).

“The US Constitution apparently had no power to protect the homelands of indigenous peoples… But the Constitution did explicitly protect the land rights of citizens who were individual property owners,” (Kimmerer, 2016).

The real picture - the lovely San Francisco, like the rest of America, was not the result of dialogue or “giving,” but a takeover. It was the result of the, “looting of an entire continent and its resources,” (Dunbar-Ortiz, 2015), and genocide of its original immigrants and the systematic stripping of their culture, language, and identity. Of the 1500 families of the Ramaytush before the missionaries arrived; only one family lineage survives now, (ramaytush.com).

“So much was scattered and lost… graves of half the people. Language. Knowledge. Names.” (Kimmerer, 2016).

I think of the woods in San Francisco named after John Muir who showed great concern for the plight of bears, yet was quick to label the Indians of Merced Valley near Yosemite as “dirty and irregular,” and callously dismissive of their systemic genocide as he tried to attract the white tourist, “As to the Indians, most of them are dead or civilized into useless innocence,” (Purdy, 2015).

In this context I wanted to add something that used to confuse and lend to identity confusion as a child - why was everyone who was “brown-ish” called Indian? I’m of Indian (the country) descent; India used to be a bunch of kingdoms till the British clubbed them as India; the name given in the Independent Indian constitution is actually Bharat. India was the East Indies, Caribbean nations became the West Indies; Columbus set out in search of India and its spices and labeled the indigenous people of the US as Indians. Did everyone Brown and ‘native’ become the “other” body, clubbed as ‘Indian’ by the Global North?

San Francisco from the Air

Photo Credit:Hari Srinivasan

Delightful lights of San Francisco below

City by the Sea

Row after row of twinkling city lights

Lights that glow as the plane flies low

Expanse of the Pacific Bay with its Golden Gate

.....Dominate the landscape

San Francisco is said to be,

The most picturesque of US Cities. 

Just full of natural beauty!!

When you take a birds eye view of San Francisco, I have to wonder what the birds flying above think of our cities. After reading about the disruptive impact on wildlife due to the lights at the border wall, I wondered about the impact of the ever increasing lights of the growing cities on the birds, perhaps disrupting their flight patterns and food sources.

Photos Credit:  Eduardo Jacobo

But what is this natural beauty? What is natural?

… Is it that giant red steel bridge on the Pacific we call Golden Gate?

… Is it the row of neatly arranged houses on the hills?

… Is it the homes built from trees stripped from Oakland woods?

… Is it the manicured lawns of Golden Gate Park? 

… Is it the small pieces of forest we have left untouched (for now)?

Have we redefined natural beauty to mean manmade rearrangements?

What mind-bodies do we see? Who has access?

When I think of nature, it is the personal growth advisor and your BFF. You see it inside, outside and all around. Nature is felt, not just seen; the human body is deeply enmeshed in nature. But what is natural? We seemed to have blurred the difference between natural, unnatural and manmade (Cronon, 1995).

Accessing Nature

Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo

Image Credit: goslides.com

A site for sore eyes

Blue and green with white sands in between. 

Toes crunch in sand as waves wash the feet

But which mind-bodies get access to this feat?

San Francisco was built to leverage the “natural” beauty all around, but as we discussed in class, much of our landscapes, vista points and other places of “natural” recreation was created with the White, wealthy families with mobility (cars) in mind.

But why should the suburban, upper-middle-class have a monopoly on mobility? The white John Steinbeck could easily visit and rave about the beauty of Montana in his book, “Travels with Charley”. This contrasts to what we read in class about Black families being scared to visit traditionally White spaces like national parks, (Kafer, 2013). Even MLK was turned away from a national park. It is not without irony that Steinbeck had written about watching out for accidental bullets hitting people during hunting season in Montana. The White settlers had traditionally regarded the BIPOC and disabled body as inferior and disposable; imagine being in the path of dozens of trigger-happy, gun-toting White hunters during hunting season in any state.

“African Americans are much less likely than whites to find parks and open spaces welcoming, accessible, or safe; histories of white supremacist violence and lynchings in rural areas... advertisements for outdoor gear have, in turn, tended to cater to overwhelmingly white audiences,” (Kafer, 2013).

It is not without concern that all over the Bay Area (including SF), many beaches are private access only. The same can be said of Maui, where local islanders were discussing on a TV program how beach access was restricted by the growing number of resorts. The islanders, like the Indigenous Indians, were being made foreigners in their own land.

“The natural environment is also “built”: literally so in the case of trails and dams, metaphorically so in the sense of cultural constructions and deployments of “nature,” “natural,” and “the environment.” (Kafer, 2013)

And access trails to these nature spots and scenery don’t keep the disabled in mind. How would my 75 year old grandma who has an iron rod in her leg be able to access the beach pictured in the photo above?

“Steep, narrow, and root-filled trails are barriers not just for people with mobility or vision impairments but also for some seniors and families with young children,” (Kafer, 2013).

Millions are spent in making such places accessible to the White and able-bodied. These paths and trails are regarded as reasonable and natural. Yet the little adjustments needed to provide the same access to the disabled are termed unreasonable, unnatural and even damaging to the environment. As Kafer points out, is the imagined motorized wheelchair as disturbing to the birds as the hundreds of people on that path talking loudly on their cell phones?

“What is deployed is the “disability-equals-alienation-from-nature trope,” where by equating cars with motorized wheelchairs, the “motorized wheelchair becomes the epitome of technological alienation, of technology’s ability to alienate us from our own wild nature and the wilderness around us,” (Kafer, 2013).

Not only do the disabled not get to enjoy or access nature, they are also expected to keep quiet, not complain and be preferably unheard. They are even told they are selfish, a presumption that the wheelchair user must be damaging to the environment compared to the other hikers.

“... the hiker’s access to parks and wilderness is natural, but everyone else’s (those in “motorized wheelchairs,” for example) is political, debatable, and ideally stoppable. To tell a tale of a lack of appropriate access—no trails wide enough for a wheelchair or level enough for crutches—would be to insert the all-too-human into “the wilderness,” thereby violating the persistent dualisms between the human and the natural and the natural and the political,” (Kafer, 2013).

The Built Environment

Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo

A City of Slopes

San Francisco, a city of slopes

… 31 percent grade is Filbert St

… 29 percent grade is Jones St

.... many many such more.

What mind-bodies do we see?

Slopes, who gets to navigate?

Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo

Footsteps on the steps

What of the SideSteps & UnSteps?

What about Me?

How are stairs, any form of share?

When it comes to chairs?

(Clipart Credit: GoSlides.com)

Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo

Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo. 

We call this beauty?  A Concrete “Jungle”?

A bay and a bridge and patches of green

A concrete jungle in its midst

Pretty patterns of concrete indeed. 

“Nature-rize” with a jungle suffix

In the boulevards of downtown San Francisco

Shadows of skyscrapers are all you see. 

Are we Spiderman to jump building to building?

What Mind-bodies do we see?  Who has access to this land?

Kafer (2013) points out that social arrangements shape our “natural” environments, which is also built. Much like the vista points and natural parks, postmodern cities (like San Francisco) are built for White, wealthy, able-bodied people which marginalizes the disabled mind-body, rendering such spaces inaccessible. Kim (2018) too points out that the “public infrastructure system is more invested in the flow of capital than the well- being of the least powerful, the disabled bodies.”

There are many types of access issues, architectural access is just the beginning. For example, crowded cities with neon lights are sensorily hard to handle for autistics like me, as is walking in the shadows of tall buildings where you can barely see the sun. I was especially interested in including photos of the steep roads of San Francisco - some slopes in San Francisco for me are utterly scary and daunting.

Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo

Spencer Battery

Vestiges of WWII Machine

Manned Guns protected the city

Kept clean even today.

No entry allowed for nature’s stray vegetation. 

A historic relic, blatantly man-made.

Spencer Battery (a place I am yet to visit) is a historic landmark that housed 12 guns used by the military to protect the city before the time of WWII and has remarkable views of the Golden Gate Bridge backdrop. Eddie had an interesting observation in that it is kept clean of stray vegetation. Ergo, it's now considered part of “natural beauty” but “nature” (i.e. vegetation) is not allowed.

Kafer (2013) points to Linda Vance’s essay on how eco-protection in cities with green spaces is ableist as access is correlated with loss, inability, and limitation.

“What is needed in ecofeminism, ecocriticism, and environmentalism in general are the narratives of people whose bodies and minds cause them to interact with nature in nonnormative ways…. presents alternative ways of understanding ourselves in relation to the environment, understandings which can then generate new possibilities for intellectual connections and activist coalitions,” (Kafer, 2013).

By shifting our perspectives, (which I hope will become a reality) we will find that the human built environment actually offers an opportunity for justice, for both human and non-human beings on this Earth and the land.

References

• Avalos, W. (2021, April 29). Land-Based ethics and Settler solidarity in a time of Corona and revolution. Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://arrow-journal.org/land-based-ethics-and-settler-solidarity-in-a-time-of-corona-and-revolution/
• Cronon, W. (1995). In Search of Nature. In Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton.
• Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2015). The Land. In An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States. Canada: Penguin Random House Canada.
• Kafer, A. (2013). Bodies of Nature: The Environmental Politics of Disability. In Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press.
• Kim, J. (2018). Cripping East Los Angeles. Enabling Environmental Justice in Helena María Viramontes’s Their Dogs Came with Them. In S. J. Ray, S. Alaimo, & J. Sibara (Eds.), Disability studies and the environmental humanities: Toward an eco-crip theory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
• Kimmerer, R.W. (2016) Braiding Sweetgrass. Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants”. Tantor Media
• Purdy, J., Kolbert, E., & Klein, N. (2015). Environmentalism's racist history. Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/environmentalisms-racist-history
• Srinivasan, H. (2019, December 02). The Daily Californian: A conversation with disability rights activist Judith Heumann Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://www.dailycal.org/2019/11/26/a-conversation-with-disability-rights-activist-judith-heumann/
• Ramaytush Ohlone. (n.d.). Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://www.ramaytush.com/

Disability Studies Scholars

 Why do Disability Studies scholars want to use such complex, almost convoluted language when the same ideas and issues could've been distilled into less complex language?

Surely less complex formal language can be equally as powerful in its informational, argumentation and persuasive capability and in getting the point across successfully; without becoming "less scholarly".

I'm taking not one but two Disability Studies classes at U C Berkeley this semester, and while I love the lectures and discussion during class delivered by the outstanding professors here, my take on some of the "scholarly" readings are quite another thing.

In a recent reading it took many many pages before to express a simple idea. It was like going through layers of camouflage to get to that idea; jargon-ny language being the camouflage. 

There are actually some very good ideas and thoughts, that make us think, reflect, think of the interconnectedness of disability justice, climate justice, animal rights, marginalization, accessibility, stigma, discrimination etc.

But these all can be unearthed only after you strip off these veneers of other language which almost get in the way. You are left with a partial feeling of annoyance, impatience and exhaustion, when your mind should be fully engrossed over the thoughts presented in these readings.

The irony: Disability Studies talks the talk about accessibility and limited-spoons in the disability community. They need to walk the walk by showing and demonstrating how scholarly language itself (including their own)  can/should be accessible.

 irony is that many of these reading underline societal inaccessibility as a fundamental issue. Yet these very disability study readings are the very picture of inaccessibility. 

This is not a critique on other disciplines, that is a whole other discussion, but specifically disability studies.

The other question is, Does it not take extra spoons to strip off all those additional veeners to get to the gist of what the author is saying, for a "limited-spoons" disability population.

For those unfamiliar with the idea of spoons or spoon theory, its the idea that all of us have only so much bandwidth/spoons in one day. Every task takes some level of time and effort. When u are disabled, your bandwidth shrinks even more as some/much of the time is taken up by disability related challenges. You have to weigh in on where your spoons are best spent so you can carry onto successfully navigating another day.

The point:  Disability Studies scholars in particular need to lead by example to demonstrate what accessibility can look like in their own work.

And I'm taking not 1 but 2 disabilities studies class this sem.

As much as I love the lectures and discussion in class taught by some amazing faculty, some of the readings are quite another issue. In one recent reading it took over many many pages to explain one simple idea. All the while I was distracted, mentally jumping impatiently, almost a little annoyed, with a, What are you trying to say? & Just get to the point please."

Boundaries

 Boundaries

Lady Liberty beckons

All to gaze at the wall in Nogales

brave hidden water in the blazing sands.

Nature weaponized!!

Boundaries

Arbitrary line drawn in world geography

Geomorphology gone extinct

Political land redistricting 1848

Human and nonhuman alike

Othering 

.. the BIPOC body

...the disabled body

...nonhuman bodies when it suits power needs. 

Nature exploited for supremacy

Categorize and disconnect. 

Who decides?

Who gets Agency?

Binary, privilege v. pain. 

The migrant body, a physical wall

The disabled body, a societal wall

Ever at edge of resources and land 

Land is belonging and body

Deemed purposeless, cast aside

Inaccessibility, the ultimate price

Periphery. 

(written during one my Disability Studies courses @UC Berkeley)

Marginalized Bodies as Disposable Bodies

 A presentation done in class today

 

Found Objects in Nature

Found Objects in Nature

Is what we think of as"Natural/Nature" really all that Natural?

I have not one but 2 found objects that I want to bring up.

One is the Albany Bulb.  It is this jutting piece of peninsula that hugs the Bay Trail in Albany, and a delightful place to hike. As you meander down the neck (the narrow part) to the actual roundish bulb at the end, you feel you are almost at an island out in the bay, with delightful view of the Bay Bridge on the one side and the Golden Gate Bridge and the hilly Marin county on the other. Sitting there, you can watch the poetry of the sun set over the silver ocean at dusk. Sometimes, you are granted the company of seagulls, ospreys and a falcon as you drink in the view.

But like the Rocky Mountain Arsenal, the Albany Bulb is also the site of a former man-made landfill (till 1983) from construction sites including the nearby Golden Gate Fields Racetrack. The early history of the Bay Area not only meant deforestation of Oakland trees to construct much of San Francisco but also an attempt to fill the shallow Bay. Remains of construction concrete and rebar litter the ground of the bulb though now overgrown by non-native vegetation like acacias, broom, fennel and palm. It is also become a habitat for small wildlife like snakes, owls, hares and the like. But you can still seen rusted iron rods peering out of giant concrete slabs making for a footing that needs care.

From the 1990s it also became a place for the homeless, who faced periodic eviction by the city as their numbers grew. It has also been an artist mecca of sorts with interesting artwork littered around the bulb, many using the debris found on the bulb.

At the end of the day, the bulb is a manmade creation which has had significant impacts on the natural world around it, like altering bay currents. Yet it is now considered part of the natural setting of the East Bay Parks and Trails. It gives us a moment of pause as we reflect upon the fact that what we now think of as "natural" was in fact not natural at all but a manmade artifact.

The 2nd found object I have noticed for a long time now are the “Vista Points” that one sees along the freeways. There is some irony in that we have to create designated spaces so that we humans can take a break to enjoy nature. Have we altered nature so much that it is now has to be compartmentalized into our lives?




==========

Comments:

I love that you chose the Albany landfill and elude to its interesting recent local history. It's a place I have a longstanding relationship to and have observed so many changes with how the space is used by humans (and their dogs) over the years. It's the first place I remember seeing a shooting star in the city. So much of the bay's coastline is infill, something that has created disastrous effects to large earthquakes in the area...makes me think about the part of the Cronon piece that talked about the unnaturalness of "natural disasters."

I like how you mentioned that society must "create designated spaces so that we humans can take a break to enjoy nature". I can definitely relate to this. This statement made me realize that in every day actions society has normalized the fact that we must be grateful for being able to access local parks and preserves for enjoying nature and escaping our metropolis when in reality it is us humans that have taken away from nature to begin with.

I found your second object particularly interesting to me! It reminds me of parks/ gardens that exist in cities so that people can get away from the concrete/ constructed world and be in a more "natural" setting. I also thought about nature conservatories and zoos, which are literally here to conserve parts of nature that would otherwise be extinct due to human alteration of the world.

Thanks for sharing, Hari! I too enjoy walking around and enjoying the views at Albany bulb. It's so interesting to consider its history. It almost makes me feel guilty to be enjoying the space at the expense of unhoused people who were evicted. I also love how the bay, lingering debris, and art come together to produce a space that is not strictly natural or unnatural.