Showing posts with label Diagnosis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Diagnosis. Show all posts

Do you grow out of autism?

 The understanding of autism has come full circle—from Kanner’s original view that it is a lifelong condition, to the mid-century belief that it was something you might grow out of, and now back to recognizing autism as a spectrum of experiences that continue into adulthood. This evolving perspective has profound implications for how we support and accommodate autistics at every stage of life.

Kanner’s Early View: Autism as a Lifelong Condition

In 1943, child psychiatrist Leo Kanner published his groundbreaking paper on autism, describing it as a rare but distinct developmental disorder. He identified autism as a condition that appeared from early infancy and persisted throughout life, believing it to be innate. His observations of children with social difficulties, repetitive behaviors, and an “insistence on sameness” led him to conclude that these traits were deeply embedded and unlikely to disappear.

Kanner’s view of autism was revolutionary at the time, as he set autism apart from other mental health conditions. He noted that while some children might improve with intervention, autism itself was a lifelong condition. This perspective laid the foundation for early autism research and clinical practice.

The Shift: Autism as a Childhood Disorder

By the mid-20th century, the focus on autism began to shift, and the condition came to be viewed more as a childhood disorder. Several factors contributed to this change:

  1. Lack of Longitudinal Data: In the early years of autism research, there was little long-term data on how autistic children fared into adulthood. Without follow-up studies to track their development, the focus remained on interventions aimed at children, especially those designed to improve communication and social skills. This narrow focus reinforced the belief that autism was primarily a childhood condition, and there was little understanding of how the condition evolved across the lifespan.

  2. Influence of Developmental Psychology: During the 1950s and 1960s, autism was studied within the context of developmental psychology, which emphasized stages of growth in children. Autism became viewed through the lens of early childhood development, which often led to the assumption that autistic children could “grow out of” the condition. The lack of focus on adult outcomes further entrenched the belief that autism was something that primarily affected children.

  3. Institutionalization and Societal Factors: A significant factor in the mid-century shift was the institutionalization of autistic individuals, especially those with more severe symptoms. During much of the 20th century, many autistic children were placed in institutions, often isolated from the community. This removed many autistic adults from public view (out of sight is out of mind) and contributed to the idea that autism was primarily a childhood disorder. Without tracking autistic individuals into adulthood, the misconception persisted that autism either diminished over time or became less visible as people aged.

  4. DSM-III and the Diagnostic Focus: The third edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III), published in 1980, played a role in reinforcing the view of autism as a childhood condition. The DSM-III categorized autism as a disorder that first appeared in childhood, and it did not fully address how autism might manifest in adults. While this edition was important in standardizing the diagnosis, it contributed to the ongoing focus on childhood autism.

The Shift Back: Autism as a Lifelong Spectrum

In the late 20th century, research began to challenge the idea that autism was solely a childhood disorder. Several key developments led to the shift back to recognizing autism as a lifelong condition:

  1. Longitudinal Studies in the 1970s and 1980s: As researchers began following autistic individuals into adulthood, they found that many core features of autism—such as social and communication challenges—persisted throughout life. These studies demonstrated that while some individuals could develop coping strategies or improve in certain areas, autism did not simply go away with age. This long-term data challenged the earlier view that autism was something children could outgrow.

  2. Broader Recognition of the Autism Spectrum: The 1994 publication of the DSM-IV marked a turning point in how autism was understood. The DSM-IV expanded the definition of autism to include related conditions, such as Asperger syndrome and Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS). These changes reflected a growing awareness that autism manifested differently in individuals and affected people across the lifespan. The concept of an autism "spectrum" began to take hold, highlighting the diverse experiences of autistic individuals, including those who may have been overlooked in earlier childhood-focused models.

  3. Advocacy and Autistic Voices: The voices of autistic adults themselves began to play a key role in shifting the narrative. As more autistic individuals spoke about their experiences, it became clear that autism affected them well into adulthood, and they advocated for recognition, rights, and support that extended beyond childhood. This push for greater inclusion helped drive the shift toward understanding autism as a lifelong condition.

  4. DSM-5 and the Unified Spectrum: The publication of the DSM-5 in 2013 solidified the shift back to understanding autism as a lifelong condition. The DSM-5 introduced the term Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), which combined previous diagnoses under one umbrella. By viewing autism as a spectrum, the DSM-5 recognized that autism presents differently in individuals and persists across all stages of life. This marked a significant step toward integrating the idea that autism is not something one grows out of but a lifelong condition that requires ongoing understanding and support.

The Implications of a Lifelong Understanding

The return to understanding autism as a lifelong spectrum has profound implications for how society supports and accommodates autistic individuals. With this recognition, there is a growing focus on services that support autistic adults in areas such as employment, healthcare, and independent living. This shift also emphasizes the need for tailored support throughout different life stages, including transitions from school to work and aging as an autistic adult.

Additionally, this broader understanding allows for more research into the needs of autistic adults, including mental health, relationships, and aging. As society moves away from the childhood-only model of autism, there is greater awareness of the spectrum of experiences that autistic individuals face, and a commitment to supporting them throughout their lives.

In PlainSpeak: Plain Language for the Lay Reader

The understanding of autism has come full circle—from Kanner’s original view that it is a lifelong condition, to the mid-century belief that it was something you might grow out of, and now back to recognizing autism as a spectrum of experiences that continue into adulthood. This shift has significant implications for how we support and accommodate autistic individuals throughout their lives.

Kanner’s Early View: Autism as Lifelong

In 1943, Leo Kanner first described autism as a lifelong condition. He believed it appeared in early infancy and persisted into adulthood, noting traits like social challenges, repetitive behaviors, and a need for sameness. Kanner thought that while some children could improve with intervention, autism itself was unlikely to disappear.

The Shift to Autism as a Childhood Disorder

By the mid-20th century, autism came to be viewed primarily as a childhood disorder. Several factors contributed to this shift:

  • Lack of Longitudinal Data: Early research on autism didn’t track autistic individuals into adulthood, leading to the focus on childhood interventions. The lack of long-term studies contributed to the misconception that autism was a childhood condition.

  • Developmental Psychology Influence: Autism was often studied within childhood development models, reinforcing the idea that it was something children could potentially "grow out of" as they developed.

  • Institutionalization: Many autistic children were institutionalized, particularly those with severe symptoms. This removed autistic adults from public view, further reinforcing the idea that autism primarily affected children.

  • DSM-III (1980): The DSM-III reinforced autism as a childhood disorder, as it primarily focused on diagnosing autism in children and didn’t fully address how autism manifests in adults.

The Shift Back to Lifelong Understanding

By the 1970s and 1980s, research began to show that autism was not something individuals outgrew. Several developments led to the recognition of autism as a lifelong condition:

  • Longitudinal Studies: Research following autistic individuals into adulthood revealed that many core traits, such as social and communication challenges, persisted throughout life.

  • Broader Spectrum Recognition: The 1994 publication of the DSM-IV expanded the definition of autism to include related conditions like Asperger syndrome, acknowledging that autism manifests differently across the lifespan.

  • Autistic Advocacy: Autistic adults began advocating for recognition and support, making it clear that autism affects people well into adulthood, driving a push for lifelong understanding.

  • DSM-5 (2013): The DSM-5 introduced Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), recognizing that autism exists on a spectrum and persists across all life stages. This marked a formal acknowledgment that autism is not something people grow out of, but a lifelong condition requiring ongoing support.

Implications of a Lifelong Perspective

This shift back to viewing autism as lifelong has significant implications for how society supports autistic individuals. There is now a greater focus on providing services for autistic adults in areas like employment, healthcare, and independent living. As the understanding of autism grows, so does the commitment to supporting autistic individuals at every stage of life, ensuring that their needs are met not only in childhood but well into adulthood.

Racial Bias in Autism

Correll et al. (2002), points to societal judgements made about the Black community; that they are somehow less deserving. Goff et al. (2014) highlights racial bias in that Black children are thought to be less innocent than their White counterparts. What this racial bias translates to is substantial delays in the diagnosis of ASD for Black children, after the parents initially expressed concerns about the child’s development, despite the parents having health insurance (Costantino et al., 2020)

Read on here.....[link]




1:36 is the new ratio

The CDC just announced that the new dx ratio is 1:36 [Read article]

To give you perspective, back when I was dx in childhood it was around 1:151, when I started undergrad it had come to 1:88. Just during my undergrad, the numbers progressed from 1:64 to 1:54 and by the end of my undergrad, it was 1:44.

And
  • (But of course). Autism is reported to occur in all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. [Read article]
  • About 1:6 (17%) children aged 3–17 years were diagnosed with a Dev Disability (autism, AHHD, blindness & CP) [Read summary]
  • ASD is more than 4 times more common among boys than among girls. [Read article]

The new ratio simply can't be just due to increased dx capabilities or awareness or more adults being dx. What else is going on? We need to be investigating this. 

From https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html
 

M-CHAT Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers

Lexicon [Measures] - M-CHAT 

The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised (M-CHAT-R) is a screening tool to identify early signs of autism  in toddlers. The M-CHAT-R is a caregiver-reported questionnaire that assesses the presence of behaviors associated with ASD in toddlers aged 16 to 30 months. It is intended to screen for potential developmental concerns and determine the need for further evaluation.


Limitations
The M-CHAT-R has some limitations, including the potential for false positives or false negatives, as it is a screening tool rather than a diagnostic instrument. It relies on caregiver-reported information, which may be subject to biases or inaccuracies.

Measure, Scoring & Interpretation
The M-CHAT-R is typically administered by a clinician or early intervention specialist.  It consists of 20  items that cover different areas of development, including social communication, joint attention, play, and repetitive behaviors. Caregivers indicate whether the behaviors are observed in their child or not (scored as 1 for Yes and 0 for No). The total score is calculated by summing the scores across all items. 

The M-CHAT-R also includes a follow-up interview with additional questions to further explore areas of concern. Scoring and interpretation guidelines are provided with specific cutoff scores to identify children who may be at risk for ASD and require further evaluation.

History, Limitations, and Revisions
The M-CHAT-R is an updated version of the original M-CHAT,. It was developed by Diana Robins, Deborah Fein, and Marianne Barton in 2009. 

Citation:
Robins, D. L., Fein, D., & Barton, M. L. (2009). The Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised (M-CHAT-R). Retrieved from https://mchatscreen.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/M-CHAT-R.pdf

CARS - Childhood Autism Rating Scale

Lexicon [Measures] - CARS

The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) a behavior observation scale intended to help diagnose autism and plan interventions/therapy. CARS is administered by a clinician through direct observation and interactions and involves structured and semi-structured activities to elicit specific behaviors. The tool is designed for children aged 2 years and older.

Limitations:
  • CARS may not be suitable for individuals with co-occurring conditions or for assessing adults with autism.
  • CARS is a subjective assessment tool that relies on the judgment of the observer which means inter-rater reliability may vary depending on the experience and training of the clinician.
  • Focuses primarily on behaviors associated with autism and may not capture the full range of a child's abilities or challenges.
  • Does not provide a definitive diagnosis of autism but rather serves as a quantitative measure of symptom severity.

15 Functional domains rated in CARS
  1. Relating to People: Ability to engage in reciprocal social interactions, such as sharing enjoyment, eye contact, and response to others' emotions.
  2. Imitation: ability to mimic the actions, expressions, or sounds of others.
  3. Emotional Response: Assesses the appropriateness and variety of the child's emotional expressions and responsiveness to emotional cues from others.
  4. Body Use: physical movements and coordination.
  5. Object Use: ability to play with toys and use objects in a 'socially appropriate' manner
  6. Adaptation to Change: Flexibility and response changes in their environment or routine.
  7. Visual Response: visual attention and responses to sounds and spoken language
  8. Listening Response: attention and reactions to auditory stimuli.
  9. Taste, Smell, and Touch Response and Use: responsiveness to different sensory stimuli
  10. Fear or Nervousness: reactions to potentially fear-inducing or anxiety-provoking situations.
  11. Verbal Communication: appropriateness and usefulness of the child's verbal communication.
  12. Non-verbal Communication: appropriateness and usefulness of the child's non-verbal communication.
  13. Activity Level: physical activity level during the assessment.
  14. Level and Consistency of Intellectual Response: problem-solving abilities and the consistency of their intellectual responses.
  15. General Impressions: observer's overall impression of the child's behavior during the assessment.
The items are scored on a scale of 1-4, with 1 representing no "abnormality" and 4 as severe abnormal (I personally cringe at this language with terms like "abnormal" which makes us sound like societal misfits and outcasts). Total score ranges from 15-60; scores below 30 suggest absence of autism or very mild symptoms; 30-36 score indicate mild-moderate autism and scores above 36 indicate severe autism. 


History: CARS was developed by Eric Schopler, Robert J. Reichler, and Barbara Rochen Renner and was first published in 1988. 

Reference:
Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1988). The Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

A Brief History of the DSM and Autism

Autism Lexicon [Measures] - DSM

A Brief History of the DSM and Autism 

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is a critical tool used by mental health professionals worldwide to diagnose and classify mental disorders.

The Modern Era: DSM-5

  • DSM-5 (2013): The most recent edition introduced significant changes to the diagnosis of autism. Key updates include:

    • Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): The DSM-5 combined the previously separate diagnoses of Autistic Disorder, Asperger's Disorder, Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, and PDD-NOS into a single diagnosis: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This change reflects the understanding that these conditions are part of a single continuum with varying degrees of severity.

    • Two Domains: The DSM-5 criteria for ASD are based on two domains instead of three. These are:

      • Social Communication and Interaction: Persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts.

      • Restricted, Repetitive Patterns of Behavior, Interests, or Activities: This includes repetitive movements, insistence on sameness, highly restricted interests, and hyper- or hypo-reactivity to sensory input.

    • Severity Levels: The DSM-5 includes severity levels to indicate the level of support needed: Level 1 (requiring support), Level 2 (requiring substantial support), and Level 3 (requiring very substantial support).

    • Specifiers and Comorbidities: The DSM-5 allows for specifiers to provide additional detail about the presentation of ASD, such as the presence of intellectual or language impairments, and acknowledges common comorbidities like anxiety, depression, and ADHD.

Refining the Diagnosis: DSM-IV and DSM-IV-TR

  • DSM-IV (1994): This edition further refined the classification of autism under Pervasive Developmental Disorders, which included Autistic Disorder, Asperger's Disorder, Rett's Disorder, Childhood Disintegrative Disorder, and Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Not Otherwise Specified (PDD-NOS). This allowed for greater differentiation among various forms of autism.

  • DSM-IV-TR (2000): The text revision did not significantly change the criteria but provided updated information and clarified diagnostic guidelines.

The Emergence of Autism: DSM-III and DSM-III-R

  • DSM-III (1980): This edition marked a significant shift by introducing "Infantile Autism" as a distinct category under Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDD). This was the first time autism was recognized as separate from schizophrenia.

  • DSM-III-R (1987): The revised edition expanded the criteria and changed the term to "Autistic Disorder," providing more specific diagnostic criteria and acknowledging a broader range of symptoms.

The Early Years: DSM-I and DSM-II

  • DSM-I (1952): The first edition of the DSM did not include autism. At the time, autism was not widely recognized as a distinct condition.

  • DSM-II (1968): The second edition included a diagnosis of "schizophrenic reaction, childhood type," reflecting the early belief that autism was related to childhood schizophrenia.

RDoc vs DSM in the context of Autism

Lexicon [Measures] RDoc, DSM

RDoc v DSM
The RDoC (Research Domain Criteria) & DSM  (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) are both tools used in the field of mental health, but they approach the understanding and classification of mental disorders from different perspectives. 

DSM is a clinically focused tool for diagnosing mental disabilities based on symptomatic criteria, while RDoC is a research-focused framework aiming to understand mental health disorders from a multidimensional, biopsychosocial perspective
  • DSM : Published by the American Psychiatric Association. It provides clear diagnostic categories based on observable behavior and reported symptoms. However, the DSM is often criticized for its categorical approach, where a patient either has or does not have a particular disability.
  • RDoC : Developed by NIMH. The RDoC is not a diagnostic tool;  it's a research framework. RDoC aims to integrate many levels of information (from genomics and circuits to behavior) to better understand basic dimensions of functioning that span the full range of human behavior . The goal of RDoC is to provide a more dimensional approach to understanding mental disabilities, based on neuroscience and behavioral science, rather than purely on observable symptoms.
Autism and RDoC
Autism, under the RDoC framework, is seen not as a single, homogeneous disorder but as a spectrum that includes a variety of symptoms and behaviors that can vary widely in challenge-level and impact-level. This aligns with the current understanding of autism as a "spectrum."

For example, RDoC organizes its research around several "domains" of human psychological functioning, including cognitive processes, social processes, and arousal/regulatory systems, all of which are areas where autistics may show differences. Within these domains, RDoC further identifies specific constructs - like social communication and perception, or cognitive systems related to attention and perception - that could be targets for research into the biological and behavioral underpinnings of autism.


Challenges in implementing RDoC
There are potential challenges to implementing RDoC principles more fully into research or clinical practice for autism.
  • Trying to map a heterogeneous disability like Autism onto the specific domains and constructs defined by RDoC.
  • Current lack of practical tools and measures available to clinicians, to assess the various domains and constructs defined by RDoC in a routine clinical setting. This includes standardized measures for assessing constructs like social communication and perception, or the cognitive systems related to attention and perception that are relevant to autism.
  • Need for further research: to validate the constructs and domains defined by RDoC, and to understand how these relate to the symptoms and behaviors associated with autism. We need a deeper understanding of the relationships between the biological, psychological, and behavioral aspects of autism to fully implement the RDoC approach.
  • Changing Existing Systems & Acceptance in the Clinical and Research Community:  Current diagnostic systems like DSM-5 are deeply rooted in many aspects of mental health care. It must gain acceptance not only among researchers, but also among clinicians, educators, and families. This requires education and evidence that the RDoC approach can improve outcomes for autistics.
Related Posts: [DSM], [ICD], [RDoC], [Diagnosis],[Measures]

DSM vs ICD

Lexicon [Measures]-DSM & ICD


The DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) and ICD (International Classification of Diseases) are two different systems used to classify mental disabilities. 
  • The DSM is used in the US and the ICD is used internationally. 
  • The latest version of the DSM is the DSM-5-TR, which was published in March 2022 (revision of the 2013 DSM-5). The latest version of the ICD is ICD-11. It was adopted by the World Health Assembly in 2019 and came into effect on January 1, 2022.
  • The DSM is more focused on clinical dx, while the ICD is more focused on public health.
  • Both systems use a multiaxial approach, which means that they assess mental disabilities on multiple dimensions, such as symptoms, severity, and functional impairment.
  • Both systems are updated periodically to reflect new research and understanding of mental disorders. The DSM is more detailed and specific and updated more frequently than ICD. 

Related Posts: [DSM], [ICD], [RDoc], [Diagnosis],[Measures]

ICD - International Classification of Diseases

Lexicon [Measures] - ICD

The ICD (International Classification of Diseases), an international diagnostic tool by the WHO, classifies autism as a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by deficits in social interaction and communication, and repetitive behaviors or interests. The USA primarily uses the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) system for diagnosis.

PlainSpeak: The ICD (International Classification of Diseases), a global guide used by doctors, defines autism as a condition with social interaction and communication challenges, and repetitive behaviors or interests. In the USA, doctors mainly use the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) system for diagnosis.

Related Posts: [DSM], [ICD], [RDoc], [Diagnosis],[Measures]

DSM-5 Diagnostic Statistical Manual

The DSM-5, a diagnostic tool published by the American Psychiatric Association, classifies autism as a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by persistent deficits in social communication and interaction, along with restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities.

PlainSpeak: The DSM-5, a guide used by doctors to diagnose mental health conditions, defines autism as a condition where people have challenges with social interactions and communication, and often have specific, repetitive behaviors or interests.

Related Posts [DSM],[ICD],[RDoc],[Measures],[Diagnosis]