A moment of peace
Hints of green
Softly appears, shy and demure,
A promise of new life, fresh and pure
The brain is a Giant Prediction Machine
Poem follows Prof Mark Wallace's comment in class "The Brain is a giant prediction machine" after a discussion on the growing popularity of Bayesian Statistical Models in research.
The brain is a giant prediction machine
Bayesian model-like, it constantly schemes
Past experiences and memories in its grasp
Current sensory input, processed in a flash.
A bundle of irrational worry
Each day i wake up with dread and hurry
Fears and doubts consume, a constant flurry
Hope still flickers in internal jury
STAT: Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children
Limitations
Scoring and Interpretation
The STAT includes a series of play-based activities and social interactions between the child and the examiner. The examiner observes and scores the child's behaviors in different domains, such as joint attention, pretend play, and social responsiveness.
The STAT scoring involves rating specific behaviors observed during the play-based interactions. The scoring criteria may vary depending on the specific version or adaptation of the STAT being used. There are established cutoff scores that help identify children who may be at risk for ASD and require further evaluation by a qualified professional.
History and Revisions:
The STAT was developed by Wendy Stone, Barry L. Prizant, and Samuel P. Openden in 2008.
Citation:
Stone, W. L., Prizant, B. M., & Openden, S. (2008). The Screening Tool for Autism in Toddlers and Young Children (STAT). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228625486_STAT_Screening_Tool_for_Autism_in_Toddlers_and_Young_Children
WISC - Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
Lexicon [Measures] - WISC
WISC-V (Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children) is an IQ test used in children (age 6-16 yrs 11 mo) and takes approximately 60-85 minutes. It was developed by David Wechsler (5th Ed 2014).
Limitations wrt Autism
Autistic children may have specific challenges related to social communication, sensory sensitivities, and executive functioning, which can impact their performance on certain subtests. [Also see post on Why IQ Testing especially problematic in the Autistic Population]
WISC has 10 Subtests that fall under 5 index score categories
- Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI):
- Similarities: verbal reasoning and concept formation by assessing the ability to identify how two words or concepts are similar.
- Vocab: language development and word knowledge by asking the child to define or explain the meaning of various words
- Information: general knowledge and comprehension of factual information by asking questions about a wide range of topics.
- Visual Spatial Index (VSI)
- Block Design: Assesses spatial perception, visual-motor integration, and problem-solving abilities through block imitation
- Fluid Reasoning Index (FRI):
- Matrix Reasoning: nonverbal reasoning & fluid intelligence by asking child to identify patterns and complete visual matrices.
- Picture Concepts
Picture Concepts: analyze visual stimuli, recognize relationships, and form abstract concepts by asking the child to identify common features and group pictures based on concepts.
- Working Memory Index (WMI):
- Digit Span: attention and working memory through ability to repeat a series of digits forwards and backward.
- Picture Span: working memory through recall of sequence of pictures in correct order
- Processing Speed Index (PSI)
- Coding: measure visual-motor speed and attention by child copying symbols paired with numbers within a specified time limit
- Symbol Search: visual scanning and processing speed by asking the child to identify target symbols within a specified time limit.
The Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) is the combination of the index scores. It represents overall intellectual functioning and is calculated based on the combined performance across all subtests.
Interpretation involves comparing an individual's performance to normative data (percentile ranks, confidence intervals, and descriptive categories), considering the person's age and the index and subtest scores obtained.
Loneliness
Empty walls surround
DNA Repair
Pollina et al. 2023
The paper describes a new method called sBLISS-seq for identifying DNA damage sites in cells. The authors used this method to study the role of a protein called Ep400 in repairing DNA damage.
The paper suggests that the link between neuronal activity and DNA repair mediated by NPAS4-NuA4 may be relevant to NDD like autism. This is because damage at activity-dependent regulatory elements may be a source of neuronal dysfunction in these disabilities.
Key Takeaways & Contributions.
- Discovery of a specialized chromatin regulatory mechanism in the brain that couples synaptic activity to genome preservation.
Methods
- The development of a new method called sBLISS-seq for identifying DNA damage sites in cells.
- The use of
- chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) to study the binding of proteins to DNA.
- CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing to create knockout cell lines.
- RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to study gene expression.
- immunofluorescence to study protein localization in cells.
- comet assays to measure DNA damage.
Questions raised
- What is the full extent of the role of NPAS4-NuA4 in sustaining neuronal vitality over time and contributing to cellular and organismal longevity?
- How does the link between neuronal activity and DNA repair mediated by NPAS4
- NuA4 contribute to NDD & autism, and can this mechanism be targeted for therapeutic purposes?
- What other proteins and pathways are involved in the regulation of DNA repair in response to neuronal activity, and how do they interact with NPAS4-NuA4?
- How can the sBLISS-seq method be further optimized and applied to other cell types and experimental conditions?
- Findings implications in understanding relationship between neuronal activity and genome preservation in the brain?
Haikus for the love of spring
Its feb 14 and spring is upon us. I see flowers bloom on my neighbor's tree.
In the midst of bloom,TBI Regressive Autism
Ameliorating Hemianopia with Multisensory Training (Rowland et al., 2023)
- 64 year old JM joined the study 14 months after stroke (2 infracts)
- 74 year old CW joined the study ~18 months after 1 infract (better sighted field compared to JM).
- Therapy took place over 8 months /10 sessions
- If TBI --> can those lost skills not be regained through targeted therapy. If you can restore skills in 60-70 yr old, should be able to, in a younger more plastic brain.
- If TBI --> is this related to CW & JM having practice with vision for 60-70+ years vs toddlers who only have practice with the skills for 18 mo.
- CW & JM had PT/OT for 14-18 mo before joining study; implication these therapies not that useful for regaining lost skills.
- Autistics kids are in insane amounts of therapy (childhood stuffed with ABA/speech/OT every waking hr with little advances to show for it other than the $$$ spent and lots of career advancement for therapists).
- Maybe we need rethink early childhood therapy to be more targeted to restore lost skills. Even regaining that level of lost skills improves quality of life, let alone moving beyond.
One big vagary
Nothing standard, fractured light in a prism.
Can we conclude then, so far…..
… no evidence in any evidence really
….no clues. What’s going on in this gallery.
inexplicable me. I continue to be one big vagary.