Last semester I took Prof Sunaura Taylor's Env Science Policy & Management, Disability Studies course. In Prof Taylor's words, "This course centers the body as a key analytic to understanding the more-than-human world." An absolutely intriguing course.
My Final Project
=====
San Francisco - Which Mind Bodies Have Access to the Land?
Eduardo Jacobo and I teamed up for this project and have looked at San Francisco from a few different perspectives as has been discussed in class: what constitutes Natural Beauty, the concrete jungle nature of the built environment in terms of accessibility (eg: city of slopes with some of the steepest roads in the world) and more. Which mind-bodies have access?
Our (Project) Creation Story
I have always felt uneasy and out of place in big cities; a trip to the beach is so much more enjoyable to me than going inside buildings, no matter how magnificent they are. My initial idea for the project was a big city or maybe a marketplace in India since I was there (the India idea came later but I’d already started working with Eddie by then). When Eddie initially mentioned he would be taking photos of San Francisco, it sounded like a perfect collaboration as it would add visuals to my thoughts on aspects of San Francisco I had in mind - I was especially interested in photos/visuals of steep roads, the manmade Golden Gate bridge juxtaposed against nature, walking in the shadows of tall skyscrapers and displaying the inaccessibility of the built concrete jungle. The plan thus was that he would take the photos and I would write a poetry-prose narrative around them. (We will each be handing in a separate personal reflection expanding on these ideas in the context of what was discussed in class.)
In addition, “collaboration-cooperation” was all the more relevant for me given that this was a disability-studies class. I’d first heard of this term during my interview with Judy Heumann for the Daily Cal, (Srinivasan, 2019) and it has stuck with me since.
We can extend this “collaboration-cooperation” to the relationship we humans need to have with the land we exist on and our fellow non-human and nonliving things. It has to be a treaty with the land, following in the footsteps of the Skywoman; the indeginous struggle is really a struggle for all earth given that the mess we’ve managed to make of the earth.
A Land Acknowledgement.
Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
We acknowledge that the city of San Francisco sits on the unceded, ancestral homeland of the Ramaytush Ohlone peoples who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco Peninsula.
Before the missionaries and the White man
Lived peoples of Ramaytush Ohlone
From the time of Sky Woman.
Treaties with living and nonliving.
Harmonized with the land.
Everything, a cherished relative.
Imprisoned, All but wiped out presently.
Even today, one of the fundamental aspects of settler colonialism is to superimpose their culture and ideas on top of indigenous culture so the new ways became the right way, and the old ways the wrong ways that needed to be eliminated and forgotten. In America this took the form of multiculturalism which meant indigenous people were reduced from treaty-holding independent nations to yet another minority that supposedly contributed to America's greatness with their giving spirit, (Dunbar-Ortiz, 2015).
The real picture - the lovely San Francisco, like the rest of America, was not the result of dialogue or “giving,” but a takeover. It was the result of the, “looting of an entire continent and its resources,” (Dunbar-Ortiz, 2015), and genocide of its original immigrants and the systematic stripping of their culture, language, and identity. Of the 1500 families of the Ramaytush before the missionaries arrived; only one family lineage survives now, (ramaytush.com).
I think of the woods in San Francisco named after John Muir who showed great concern for the plight of bears, yet was quick to label the Indians of Merced Valley near Yosemite as “dirty and irregular,” and callously dismissive of their systemic genocide as he tried to attract the white tourist, “As to the Indians, most of them are dead or civilized into useless innocence,” (Purdy, 2015).
In this context I wanted to add something that used to confuse and lend to identity confusion as a child - why was everyone who was “brown-ish” called Indian? I’m of Indian (the country) descent; India used to be a bunch of kingdoms till the British clubbed them as India; the name given in the Independent Indian constitution is actually Bharat. India was the East Indies, Caribbean nations became the West Indies; Columbus set out in search of India and its spices and labeled the indigenous people of the US as Indians. Did everyone Brown and ‘native’ become the “other” body, clubbed as ‘Indian’ by the Global North?
San Francisco from the Air
Photo Credit:Hari Srinivasan
Delightful lights of San Francisco below
City by the Sea
Row after row of twinkling city lights
Lights that glow as the plane flies low
Expanse of the Pacific Bay with its Golden Gate
.....Dominate the landscape
San Francisco is said to be,
The most picturesque of US Cities.
Just full of natural beauty!!
Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
But what is this natural beauty? What is natural?
… Is it that giant red steel bridge on the Pacific we call Golden Gate?
… Is it the row of neatly arranged houses on the hills?
… Is it the homes built from trees stripped from Oakland woods?
… Is it the manicured lawns of Golden Gate Park?
… Is it the small pieces of forest we have left untouched (for now)?
Have we redefined natural beauty to mean manmade rearrangements?
What mind-bodies do we see? Who has access?
When I think of nature, it is the personal growth advisor and your BFF. You see it inside, outside and all around. Nature is felt, not just seen; the human body is deeply enmeshed in nature. But what is natural? We seemed to have blurred the difference between natural, unnatural and manmade (Cronon, 1995).
Accessing Nature
Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
Image Credit: goslides.com
A site for sore eyes
Blue and green with white sands in between.
Toes crunch in sand as waves wash the feet
But which mind-bodies get access to this feat?
San Francisco was built to leverage the “natural” beauty all around, but as we discussed in class, much of our landscapes, vista points and other places of “natural” recreation was created with the White, wealthy families with mobility (cars) in mind.
But why should the suburban, upper-middle-class have a monopoly on mobility? The white John Steinbeck could easily visit and rave about the beauty of Montana in his book, “Travels with Charley”. This contrasts to what we read in class about Black families being scared to visit traditionally White spaces like national parks, (Kafer, 2013). Even MLK was turned away from a national park. It is not without irony that Steinbeck had written about watching out for accidental bullets hitting people during hunting season in Montana. The White settlers had traditionally regarded the BIPOC and disabled body as inferior and disposable; imagine being in the path of dozens of trigger-happy, gun-toting White hunters during hunting season in any state.
And access trails to these nature spots and scenery don’t keep the disabled in mind. How would my 75 year old grandma who has an iron rod in her leg be able to access the beach pictured in the photo above?
The Built Environment
Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
A City of Slopes
San Francisco, a city of slopes
… 31 percent grade is Filbert St
… 29 percent grade is Jones St
.... many many such more.
What mind-bodies do we see?
Slopes, who gets to navigate?
Photos Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
Footsteps on the steps
What of the SideSteps & UnSteps?
What about Me?
How are stairs, any form of share?
When it comes to chairs?
(Clipart Credit: GoSlides.com)
Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo.
We call this beauty? A Concrete “Jungle”?
A bay and a bridge and patches of green
A concrete jungle in its midst
Pretty patterns of concrete indeed.
“Nature-rize” with a jungle suffix
In the boulevards of downtown San Francisco
Shadows of skyscrapers are all you see.
Are we Spiderman to jump building to building?
What Mind-bodies do we see? Who has access to this land?
Kafer (2013) points out that social arrangements shape our “natural” environments, which is also built. Much like the vista points and natural parks, postmodern cities (like San Francisco) are built for White, wealthy, able-bodied people which marginalizes the disabled mind-body, rendering such spaces inaccessible. Kim (2018) too points out that the “public infrastructure system is more invested in the flow of capital than the well- being of the least powerful, the disabled bodies.”
There are many types of access issues, architectural access is just the beginning. For example, crowded cities with neon lights are sensorily hard to handle for autistics like me, as is walking in the shadows of tall buildings where you can barely see the sun. I was especially interested in including photos of the steep roads of San Francisco - some slopes in San Francisco for me are utterly scary and daunting.
Photo Credit: Eduardo Jacobo
Spencer Battery
Vestiges of WWII Machine
Manned Guns protected the city
Kept clean even today.
No entry allowed for nature’s stray vegetation.
A historic relic, blatantly man-made.
Spencer Battery (a place I am yet to visit) is a historic landmark that housed 12 guns used by the military to protect the city before the time of WWII and has remarkable views of the Golden Gate Bridge backdrop. Eddie had an interesting observation in that it is kept clean of stray vegetation. Ergo, it's now considered part of “natural beauty” but “nature” (i.e. vegetation) is not allowed.
By shifting our perspectives, (which I hope will become a reality) we will find that the human built environment actually offers an opportunity for justice, for both human and non-human beings on this Earth and the land.
References
- Avalos, W. (2021, April 29). Land-Based ethics and Settler solidarity in a time of Corona and revolution. Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://arrow-journal.org/land-based-ethics-and-settler-solidarity-in-a-time-of-corona-and-revolution/
- Cronon, W. (1995). In Search of Nature. In Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York: W.W. Norton.
- Dunbar-Ortiz, R. (2015). The Land. In An Indigenous Peoples' History of the United States. Canada: Penguin Random House Canada.
- Kafer, A. (2013). Bodies of Nature: The Environmental Politics of Disability. In Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press.
- Kim, J. (2018). Cripping East Los Angeles. Enabling Environmental Justice in Helena MarÃa Viramontes’s Their Dogs Came with Them. In S. J. Ray, S. Alaimo, & J. Sibara (Eds.), Disability studies and the environmental humanities: Toward an eco-crip theory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Kimmerer, R.W. (2016) Braiding Sweetgrass. Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants”. Tantor Media
- Purdy, J., Kolbert, E., & Klein, N. (2015). Environmentalism's racist history. Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/environmentalisms-racist-history
- Srinivasan, H. (2019, December 02). The Daily Californian: A conversation with disability rights activist Judith Heumann Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://www.dailycal.org/2019/11/26/a-conversation-with-disability-rights-activist-judith-heumann/
- Ramaytush Ohlone. (n.d.). Retrieved Apr 27, 2021, from https://www.ramaytush.com/
Thank you so much for such an amazing blog.Study Loan In India
ReplyDelete