first in-person meeting at Memorial Glade
Caltopia
An in-person Caltopia this year brought out a large crowd of student.
Whence "social distancing!!"
Second Mention in Time Magazine
I got a 2nd mention in a Time Magazine Article in an article by Eric Garcia. :)
https://time.com/6092407/autism-making-life-easier/
Neuronal Pruning
Autism Lexicon: Neuronal Pruning:
Neuronal pruning is the process of selectively eliminating excess synapses and neurons during brain development to optimize neural circuitry. In autism, atypical pruning has been implicated, potentially leading to altered connectivity and information processing in the brain.
PlainSpeak: Neuronal pruning is the brain's way of trimming excess connections to make neural pathways more efficient. In autism, this process may not occur as expected, which could affect how the brain processes information.
Incoming Lambda
Not enough that we have a delta variant causing grief the world over.
And now there a Lambda variant which is slowly creeping in.
The Double Empathy Problem - Understanding Social Differences in Autism
Have you ever felt misunderstood, even though you were trying to communicate clearly? This feeling is common in social interactions between autistic and non-autistic people, a phenomenon known as the "Double Empathy Problem." Coined by Dr. Damian Milton, this idea suggests that the communication challenges often attributed to autism are actually shared by both autistic and non-autistic individuals. It's not just that autistic people have difficulty understanding others; non-autistic people can also struggle to understand autistic perspectives.
Traditional views often frame autistic individuals as lacking empathy, but the Double Empathy Problem challenges this by highlighting that misunderstandings go both ways. For instance, autistic people might communicate in a very direct and straightforward manner, which can sometimes be misinterpreted by non-autistic individuals as being blunt or insensitive. On the other hand, autistic individuals might find it hard to interpret subtle social cues that non-autistic people use, like sarcasm or implied meanings.
This mismatch in communication styles can lead to social friction and misunderstandings. For example, studies have shown that non-autistic people often have difficulty understanding the emotions and intentions of autistic individuals, just as autistic people may find it challenging to interpret non-autistic social cues. This mutual misunderstanding can lead to frustration and social isolation for autistic people, as they might feel judged or misunderstood based on different social norms.
The Double Empathy Problem encourages us to think about autism differently. Instead of seeing autistic people as lacking something, it helps us recognize that social interactions are a two-way street. By understanding that both autistic and non-autistic people have unique ways of communicating and seeing the world, we can foster more inclusive and understanding communities. This means being patient, open-minded, and willing to learn from each other, which can help bridge the gap between different ways of experiencing and interpreting social interactions.
In essence, the Double Empathy Problem reminds us that communication is a shared responsibility. By embracing this perspective, we can work towards a more inclusive society where everyone's way of communicating is respected and valued.
Related Posts on [The Double Empathy Problem]
Insights on the Complexity of Mental Health & Disability
I was a speaker on this panel by UC Davis Mind Institute on mental health on Aug 6
Disability is Possibility
Sweep wide open.
The door of Opportunity.
Recognition, Visibility.
Disability is Possibility.
Disability is Possibility.
Autistic Inertia - I can so relate
Keynote - Youth Leadership Forum - Able SC
I was keynote at the Youth Leadership Forum by South Carolina Able on 7/26/21
YLF 2021 is in full swing! Delegates have spent the morning building their disability pride and hearing from our keynote speaker, @harisri108 , about how small pieces of self-advocacy can lead to big changes for the disability community!
As Hari said, 'I think when you have a disability, some part of you is always in some kind of self doubt about your capabilities'. For the rest of the day, we are continuing to build our disability pride and work on ways to get past that self doubt to become strong advocates for ourselves and others!
[Image: A computer screen showing a presentation. The presentation read, 'Pebbles in the Pond of Change. Small pebbles count and add to the ripple in that pond of change'. A picture shows 5 pebbles creating a ripple effect in a body of water.]
My first book reading
my first book reading (via zoom) at the Oakland Asian Cultural Center, on 7/22
RDoc vs DSM in the context of Autism
- DSM : Published by the American Psychiatric Association. It provides clear diagnostic categories based on observable behavior and reported symptoms. However, the DSM is often criticized for its categorical approach, where a patient either has or does not have a particular disability.
- RDoC : Developed by NIMH. The RDoC is not a diagnostic tool; it's a research framework. RDoC aims to integrate many levels of information (from genomics and circuits to behavior) to better understand basic dimensions of functioning that span the full range of human behavior . The goal of RDoC is to provide a more dimensional approach to understanding mental disabilities, based on neuroscience and behavioral science, rather than purely on observable symptoms.
For example, RDoC organizes its research around several "domains" of human psychological functioning, including cognitive processes, social processes, and arousal/regulatory systems, all of which are areas where autistics may show differences. Within these domains, RDoC further identifies specific constructs - like social communication and perception, or cognitive systems related to attention and perception - that could be targets for research into the biological and behavioral underpinnings of autism.
Challenges in implementing RDoC
There are potential challenges to implementing RDoC principles more fully into research or clinical practice for autism.
- Trying to map a heterogeneous disability like Autism onto the specific domains and constructs defined by RDoC.
- Current lack of practical tools and measures available to clinicians, to assess the various domains and constructs defined by RDoC in a routine clinical setting. This includes standardized measures for assessing constructs like social communication and perception, or the cognitive systems related to attention and perception that are relevant to autism.
- Need for further research: to validate the constructs and domains defined by RDoC, and to understand how these relate to the symptoms and behaviors associated with autism. We need a deeper understanding of the relationships between the biological, psychological, and behavioral aspects of autism to fully implement the RDoC approach.
- Changing Existing Systems & Acceptance in the Clinical and Research Community: Current diagnostic systems like DSM-5 are deeply rooted in many aspects of mental health care. It must gain acceptance not only among researchers, but also among clinicians, educators, and families. This requires education and evidence that the RDoC approach can improve outcomes for autistics.
Double Empathy and Autism - Reframing Social Communication Challenges
The "Double Empathy Problem," a concept introduced by Dr. Damian Milton, challenges the traditional view that autistic individuals have a deficit in empathy. Instead, it posits that difficulties in social communication and understanding arise from a mismatch in neurotypical and autistic communicative styles, rather than a unilateral deficiency in autistic individuals. This perspective suggests that misunderstandings are bidirectional, resulting from differences in social norms, communication styles, and cognitive processing between neurotypical and autistic people (Milton, 2012).
Research supports the Double Empathy Problem by highlighting that both autistic and neurotypical individuals can experience challenges in understanding and empathizing with each other's perspectives. For example, Sheppard et al. (2016) found that neurotypical participants often struggled to interpret the emotions and intentions of autistic individuals, mirroring the difficulties that autistic individuals face when interpreting neurotypical communication cues. This mutual misunderstanding can lead to social friction, reduced social cohesion, and the reinforcement of stereotypes about autism.
Furthermore, studies indicate that autistic individuals often employ different communicative strategies, such as directness or focusing on specific details, which can be misinterpreted by neurotypical individuals as inappropriate or lacking empathy (Crompton et al., 2020). These differences in communication style can exacerbate social isolation and contribute to the stigmatization of autistic individuals, as they are often judged against neurotypical social norms.
The Double Empathy Problem also emphasizes the importance of a more inclusive and reciprocal approach to social interaction. This involves recognizing and valuing diverse communicative styles and fostering environments where both autistic and neurotypical individuals can engage on equitable terms.
Related Posts on [The Double Empathy Problem]
References:
- Milton, D. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: the ‘double empathy problem.’ Disability & Society, 27(6), 883-887.
- Sheppard, E., Pillai, D., Wong, G. T., Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2016). How easy is it to read the minds of people with autism spectrum disorder? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(4), 1247-1259.
- Crompton, C. J., Ropar, D., Evans-Williams, C. V., Flynn, E. G., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2020). Autistic peer-to-peer information transfer is highly effective. Autism, 24(7), 1704-1712.