Neurodiversity Nuts and Bolts

Neurodiversity is a concept that views neurological differences as natural and valuable variations of human diversity. 

Inclusion and Exclusion in the Neurodiversity Paradigm

Neurodiversity primarily includes disabilities like autism, ADHD, dyslexia, dyspraxia, and Tourette syndrome, along with disabilities that are labeled psychiatric in nature . It tends to focus on conditions that affect cognition, communication, sensory perception, and behavior. Disabilities that are less often included in discussions of neurodiversity include those that are purely medical in nature or those that do not involve differences in neurodevelopment, such as physical disabilities like spinal cord injuries or muscular dystrophy.

Neurodiversity as a Social Construct

Neurodiversity is a social construct, meaning it is a concept that society has created and accepted to understand neurological differences in a positive light. This does not imply that neurodiverse conditions themselves are not real; rather, it highlights how society chooses to value these conditions. As a social construct, neurodiversity is useful in promoting a more inclusive view of humanity, valuing diverse ways of thinking and interacting with the world. However, like all social constructs, its impact depends on how it is applied and in what context.

Origins and Evolution of the Concept

While neurodiversity is often attributed to Judy Singer, who discussed it in a 1999 book chapter, recent research clarifies that the concept was a collective effort by many autistic activists during the 1990s. As highlighted in the 2024 paper "Neurodiversity Misattribution," the theory of neurodiversity emerged from discussions and activism within the autistic community, particularly on the "Independent Living" email list in the mid-1990s. These discussions were part of a broader movement of autistic self-advocates who aimed to shift societal perceptions and promote understanding and acceptance of neurological diversity. Correct attribution is important because it acknowledges the grassroots nature of the neurodiversity movement and the contributions of many individuals who worked to develop and promote the concept.

The concept of neurodiversity builds upon the foundation laid by the broader disability rights movement, which advocates for the inclusion and acceptance of people with disabilities as full members of society. This movement, which began gaining momentum in the 1960s and 1970s, challenges societal barriers and attitudes that limit the participation of disabled individuals and promotes the rights of disabled people to be fully included in all aspects of society.

The benefits of a Neurodiversity Perspective

The neurodiversity perspective draws upon important ideas from the wider disability rights movement, particularly its emphasis on inclusion, empowerment, and a strengths-based approach to understanding differences. These include.

Education and Employment: Neurodiversity promotes practices that accommodate diverse learning/work styles and neurological profiles, aligning with the broader disability rights movement's advocacy for adapting educational/workspace environment to meet the needs of all individuals rather than enforcing a uniform model.

Acceptance and Inclusion: By encouraging acceptance of diverse ways of thinking and behaving, the neurodiversity perspective helps reduce stigma and discrimination against neurodiverse individuals.

Strengths-Based Approach: By emphasizing the strengths and abilities of neurodiverse individuals, neurodiversity highlights unique talents, such as exceptional attention to detail or innovative problem-solving skills.

Empowerment: Through advocating for accommodations and changes in societal structures, neurodiverse individuals are empowered to participate fully in society, promoting a sense of belonging and inclusion.

Criticisms and Controversies

Despite its positive aspects, the concept of neurodiversity has faced several criticisms and controversies:

Exclusion of  the more-disabled individuals: Early discussions and formulations of the neurodiversity movement often focused on individuals who could advocate for themselves. This focus led to criticism that the movement did not fully address the experiences of those with more severe disabilities who might not be able to participate in self-advocacy in the same way. Over time, there has been an ongoing dialogue within the neurodiversity movement regarding the inclusion of individuals with more severe disabilities. Some advocates have pushed for a broader understanding that includes those with higher support needs, ensuring that neurodiversity represents a spectrum that encompasses all forms of neurological differences, regardless of the level of disability or support required.

Minimization of Challenges: Some argue that while the neurodiversity framework is empowering, it may inadvertently minimize the real challenges and needs that some neurodiverse individuals face, such as co-occurring conditions or the need for specific support and interventions.

Over-Romanticization: There is a concern that neurodiversity sometimes over-romanticizes neurological differences, ignoring the fact that for some, these differences can lead to significant difficulties that impacts their daily living.

Research on Neurodiversity

Research on neurodiversity spans a range of disciplines, including psychology, education, sociology, and neuroscience. The purpose of this research is to better understand the experiences and needs of neurodiverse individuals, to develop more inclusive educational and workplace practices, and to challenge existing paradigms that may not fully accommodate neurological diversity.

Other Disability Constructs that Neurodiversity aligns with.

Neurodiversity aligns with numerous other constructs in the broader disability world. Together, these constructs contribute to a broader understanding of diversity and challenge societal norms that marginalize disabled and neurodivergent people:


Mad Pride Movement: Challenges traditional views of mental health and psychiatric conditions, advocating for the rights and dignity of individuals with lived experiences of mental health conditions. It seeks to reclaim terms like "madness" and emphasize the value of diverse mental experiences, pushing against the stigma and discrimination faced by those with psychiatric disabilities.

In fact the name of the unique makerspace disability lab at UC Berkeley is "Rad Mad Disability Lab". It was a privilege for me to lead Team Propaganda during my years at that lab. 

The Social Model of Disability: Focuses on societal barriers rather than individual impairment, positing that disability is caused by the way society is organized, rather than by a person’s impairment or difference. It emphasizes the need to remove barriers in society—whether physical, attitudinal, or systemic—to enable full participation and inclusion of disabled people.

The Human Rights Model of Disability: Rooted in international human rights law, such as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), this model emphasizes the rights of disabled people to full inclusion, participation, and equality in all aspects of society. It advocates for societal change to eliminate discrimination and barriers.

"Disability only becomes a tragedy when society fails to provide the things needed to lead one's daily life." - Judy Heumann (Disability Rights Activist)

I was also fortunate enough to work on creating ~40 case studies on low resource countries that have implemented the UNCRPD, as a research associate at Prof Victor Pineda's "World Enabled" 

Crip Theory: Challenges normative ideas of what it means to be "able" or "disabled," questioning societal norms about ability and disability, much like neurodiversity challenges norms about neurological functioning. Crip theory advocates for a more expansive understanding of diversity that includes all forms of bodily and neurological variation.

Disability Justice Framework: Expands on the disability rights movement by incorporating an intersectional approach, recognizing the interconnectedness of ableism with other forms of oppression such as racism, sexism, and heteronormativity. Disability justice highlights a commitment to recognizing and valuing diverse identities and experiences, advocating for a holistic approach that respects each individual's humanity and complexity.

Deaf Gain: Rather than viewing deafness as a loss or deficit, the concept of Deaf Gain frames it as a unique and valuable way of being in the world. This perspective highlights the benefits and cultural richness of the Deaf community, challenging societal assumptions about hearing and encouraging the appreciation of Deaf culture, language, and experiences.

Cultural and Linguistic Identity Models: Often used within Deaf and disability communities, these models emphasize the importance of cultural and linguistic identity as central to a person’s experience. They recognize that identity and culture, including communication styles and sensory experiences, are integral to the person and should be respected and valued as such.

Social Constructivist Approaches: Emphasize that many of the limitations experienced by disabled individuals are socially constructed rather than inherent to the individual. In disability studies, social constructivism explores how societal attitudes, policies, and environments create barriers to participation and inclusion.

Inclusive Research Paradigms: Prioritize the involvement of disabled people as active contributors or leaders in research that affects their lives. This contrasts with traditional research models that often exclude disabled people from meaningful participation. Inclusive research values the lived experiences of disabled individuals and ensures that their voices are central to research and policy development.

Nothing About Us Without Us: This principle, which originated from the disability rights movement, asserts that decisions affecting disabled people should not be made without their input and involvement. It advocates for the inclusion and leadership of disabled individuals in all matters that concern them, ensuring that their voices are heard and respected.

Relational Autonomy: Recognizes that autonomy and decision-making are often supported and facilitated through relationships with others, rather than being purely individualistic. In the context of neurodiversity, relational autonomy acknowledges that neurodivergent individuals may rely on supportive relationships to navigate social and systemic challenges while still maintaining control over their decisions and lives.


Essentially, while Neurodiversity has its criticisms and limitations, a neurodiversity perspective plays a crucial role in promoting acceptance and understanding of neurodiverse individuals in society. The alignment of neurodiversity with other constructs from the disability rights world underscores its importance in challenging societal norms and fostering a more inclusive and equitable world for all.